Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Salehi Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.2MHuman Services$2.1MReligion$1.6MEducation$985kFood & Nutrition$365kArts & Culture$360kInternational$188kPublic Safety & Disaster$135kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $400k
  • $250k+2 grants · $670k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Midland Memorial Foundation$400,000
First Presbyterian Church$270,000
Telluride Mountain School$200,000
DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES$100,000
100 Club of Gillespie County$100,000
River Deep Club$40,000
Wine Travel International LLC$37,500
Mountainfilm$35,000
Christ Church$20,000
Midland Fair Havens$20,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$20,000
Marty Hennessy Inspiring Children F$12,500
Kimble County Sheriff Department$10,000
Centers for Children Families$10,000
Hill Country Community Needs$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $720k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Manor Park: $275k → 14%Manor Park: $200k → 14%Manor Park: $50k → 14%Manor Park: $25k → 14%Headwaters for Heros: $5k → 17%Angel Basket: $10k → 7%Centers for Children Families: $35k → 12%San Miguel Resource Center: $10k → 7%Centers for Children Families: $35k → 12%Centers for Children Families: $30k → 12%Angel Basket: $10k → 7%Angel Basket: $10k → 7%San Miguel Resource Center: $10k → 7%Centers for Children Families: $10k → 12%Angel Basket: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 69% of Salehi Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 95% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Salehi Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.4M · 34 repeat orgs$856k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
16

Total granted

$7.4M
$565k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+15%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MANOR PARK INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $550k · revenue +62%
  • SP
    SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN
    3× · 2018–2023 · $500k · revenue +9%
  • DC
    DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $450k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MA
    Make A Wish Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $106k
  • MI
    MARC INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -11%
  • KC
    Kimble County Hospital
    one grant, 2017 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
2
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
3
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

4
Morning Star Boys Ranch

Morning Star Boys' Ranch, answering God's call to love and serve those in need, are dedicated to building responsible adults by believing in youth, and providing programs to strengthen families and the community.

Youth Development
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
7
Family Link Treatment Services Inc

A state of texas licensed foster care-adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Health
8
Tall Timber Ranch

As followers of jesus, we provide all people of all ages unique opportunities where they may discover god's love for them, deepen relationships with one another, and explore this through high-quality outdoor programming, retreats,…

Religion
9
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
10
Family Services of Tulare County Inc

The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…

Human Services
11
Helping Our Riders Succeed in Education

The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.

Human Services
12
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Agape and the most unlike its peers is Harper Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr18%33%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr15%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr18%28%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr15%51%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
108/976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,700,000 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONFirst Presbyterian Church — $1,195,000 · OtherFirst Presbyterian ChurchSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $500,000 · OtherSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASINDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC — $450,000 · OtherDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INCTrinity School — $255,750 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $235,000 · OtherGood News Ministries — $200,000 · Other+39 more — $1,403,400 · Other+39 moreTELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $700,000 · EducationTELLURIDE …RECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS — $30,000 · Education+2 more — $25,000 · EducationMANOR PARK INC — $550,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PAR…CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $110,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS F…Angel Baskets Inc — $35,000 · Human Services+2 more — $25,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINFILM — $285,000 · Arts & CultureTELLURIDE REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $145,000 · HealthHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $50,000 · HealthMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterKIMBLE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS — $130,000 · Food & NutritionMISSION AGAPE — $40,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,939,150Education$755,000Human Services$720,000Arts & Culture$295,000Health$212,500Housing & Shelter$185,000Food & Nutrition$170,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $700,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetMANOR PARK INC — $550,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $500,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetDAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC — $450,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM — $285,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $235,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS — $160,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $145,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIMBLE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS — $130,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $110,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMARC INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTELLURIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $95,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMISSION AGAPE — $40,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetAngel Baskets Inc — $35,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetBUSH TENNIS CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS — $30,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSutton County Community Trust — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC) — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKimble Rural Fire Department — $20,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetHARPER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTELLURIDE REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE AIDS BENEFIT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEADWATERS FOR HEROES — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHillcrest School Inc — $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN
  • Who funds DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAINFILM
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds KIMBLE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds MARC INC
  • Who funds TELLURIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC
  • Who funds MISSION AGAPE
  • Who funds Angel Baskets Inc
  • Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER
  • Who funds RECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS
  • Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC
  • Who funds Sutton County Community Trust
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC)
  • Who funds Kimble Rural Fire Department
  • Who funds HARPER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Beal Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · The Henry Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation · Chaparral Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Salehi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Salehi Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Salehi Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph