Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chaparral Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$602k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$5.8MReligion$1.3MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$875kEducation$499kYouth Development$244kRecreation & Sports$125kAnimals$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGBOARD CENTER$100,000
YMCA OF MIDLAND$75,000
PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER$50,000
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CHRIST CHURCH ANGLICAN$35,000
MENARD MISSION TEAM$30,000
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION$17,600
CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC$15,000
MANOR PARK INC$15,000
HARRIS COUNTY SHOTGUN TEAM$15,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
LOVE FOR THE LEAST$10,000
MENARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,000
SIBLEY NATURE CENTER$10,000
MENARD JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%A FRIEND'S HOUSE INC: $25k → 8%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%A FRIEND'S HOUSE INC: $25k → 8%YMCA OF AUSTIN: $10k → 10%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%YMCA OF AUSTIN: $10k → 10%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $199k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $160k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $100k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $50k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $25k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $15k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $15k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $10k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $3k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $40k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $35k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $25k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $25k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $15k → 12%311 MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%MANOR PARK INC: $10k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $10k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $10k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
IN
CO
MD
AZ
KS
NC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 62 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
32

Total granted

$4.2M
$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+9%

Still filing today

61%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $544k · revenue +5%
  • SL
    SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $95k · revenue +18%
  • CF
    CONSERVATION FORCE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $95k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CF
    CRUMBLEY FAMILY FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $5.5M
  • DT
    DETLTA TAU DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • TW
    THE WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Health Care Inc

The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.

Health
2
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
3
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
4
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Palmer Drug Abuse Program Midland Texas Incorporated

Helping young people & their families fight the disease of addiction on all fronts through education, prevention, intervention & recovery.

—
7
Casa of West Texas

The mission of casa of west texas is to recruit, train and support committed volunteers who are appointed by the court to advocate for the best interest of children in the foster care system.

Civil Rights
8
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
9
Midland Community Healthcare Services Inc

Midland community healthcare services provides affordable, comprehensive, accessible, culturally appropriate, cost-effect, primary healthcare services to residents mainly in midland county.

Health
10
West Midland Family Center

The mission of west midland family center is to enhance the quality of life for each generation by providing growth and achievement opportunities within a caring environment.

Human Services
11
The Bair Foundation of Texas

To provide services to children, youth, and families along with a child-placing agency. to provide therapeutic foster care.

Human Services
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas Inc

To help children reach their potential through professionally supported one-to-one relationships with measurable impact.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Midland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr11%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr18%48%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr11%26%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/65
the rest of the field
14%
6,094/42,357

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
36/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRUMBLEY FAMILY FUND — $5,544,073 · OtherCRUMBLEY FAMILY FUNDCHRIST CHURCH ANGLICAN — $1,165,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH ANGLICAN+66 more — $1,631,800 · Other+66 moreTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER — $543,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBO…SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE …CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR …MANOR PARK INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK I…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHIL…Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas — $75,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's …UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC — $73,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY O…A FRIENDS HOUSE INC — $50,000 · Human Services+2 more — $25,000 · Human ServicesDelta Tau Delta Educational Foundation Inc — $100,000 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $87,600 · EducationAUSTIN EXPLORE INC — $67,500 · EducationCLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $56,750 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC — $30,000 · EducationLITERACY COALITION OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $20,000 · Education+4 more — $26,250 · EducationACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILY — $55,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER — $50,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $47,000 · HealthMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $45,000 · HealthRETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $38,500 · HealthHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $35,000 · HealthProject Life — $35,000 · HealthHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $30,000 · HealthSTARLIGHT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $14,000 · HealthCONSERVATION FORCE INC — $95,000 · AnimalsCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsMIDLAND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,340,873Human Services$1,121,500Education$438,100Health$364,500Animals$95,000Recreation & Sports$60,000Philanthropy$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER — $543,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $142,800 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetDelta Tau Delta Educational Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION FORCE INC — $95,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $87,600 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMANOR PARK INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC — $73,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC — $67,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetA FRIENDS HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE CITY COLLEGE FUND — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $47,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $45,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $38,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetProject Life — $35,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetSIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $34,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMenard Junior Livestock Association Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMAGDALENE HOUSE OF AUSTIN — $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetMARC INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $23,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY — $17,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFORT MCKAVETT TEXAS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF MIDLAND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSTARLIGHT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHillcrest School Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF ODESSA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY GATE MINISTRIES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIA MINISTRIES USA — $10,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIDLAND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BIG BEND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHRIVING UNITED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY — $8,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds Delta Tau Delta Educational Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN EXPLORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
  • Who funds A FRIENDS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Life ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scharbauer Foundation…Abell-Hanger Foundati…Permian Basin Area Fo…Helen Greathouse Char…Beal FoundationPevehouse Family Foun…Warren Charitable Fou…The Henry FoundationWayne & Jo Ann Moore …Yarborough FoundationThe Fasken FoundationPaul and Katherine Mo…
Scharbauer Foundation IncTX67.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chaparral Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines