Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roger & Joyce Nussbaum Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2023
24
Grants FY2023
11
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$26kEducation$24kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$13kInternational$10kEnvironment$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
11
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANSHE EMETH MEMORIAL TEMPLE$4,020
GOUCHER COLLEGE$2,500
ELIJAH'S PROMISE$1,500
JEWISH FEDERATION$750
NATURE CONSERVANCY$750
MAKHELET HAMERCAZ$590
FINAL EXIT NETWORK$500
HIGHLAND PARK FIRST AID SQUAD$500
HIGHLAND PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIO$500
HIGHLAND PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
THIRTEEN$250
POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL$200
OCEANITES$200
SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 44 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
8

Total granted

$118k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-25%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthInternationalAnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GOUCHER COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +12%
  • EP
    Elijahs Promise Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • A
    ASPIRE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • PA
    POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -75%
  • FB
    FOUNDATION BUI
    one grant, 2020 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
5
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Highland Park First Aid Squad. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANSHE EMETH MEMORIAL TEMPLE: $21,990 · OtherANSHE EMETH MEMORIAL TEMPLEHIGHLAND PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,000 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INCHighland Park Public Library: $3,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD: $3,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION: $3,250 · OtherPAI: $3,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,500 · Other+32 more: $23,690 · Other+32 moreGOUCHER COLLEGE: $14,500 · EducationGOUCHER COLLEGEHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK I…University of Chicago: $700 · Education+2 more: $750 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $13,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC: $2,000 · HealthFINAL EXIT NET…POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · HealthPOPULATION ACT…+1 more: $100 · HealthElijahs Promise Inc: $8,500 · Food & NutritionZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,450 · Arts & CultureHIGHLAND PARK FIRST AID SQUAD: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $1,500 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 · InternationalHIAS INC: $500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $400 · International
Other$71,430Education$17,450Health$16,100Food & Nutrition$8,500Arts & Culture$4,450Public Safety & Disaster$4,000International$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetElijahs Promise Inc: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK FIRST AID SQUAD: $4,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFINAL EXIT NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $1,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOceanitesInc: $1,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL JERSEY INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCharity Navigator: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Elijahs Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK FIRST AID SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc ↗
  • Who funds OceanitesInc ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Max Minsky and Florence Goldste Goldstein Family Foundation IncFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Max Minsky and Florence Goldste Goldstein Family Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roger & Joyce Nussbaum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger & Joyce Nussbaum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Central Jersey Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Elijahs Promise Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roger & Joyce Nussbaum Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roger & Joyce Nussbaum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roger & Joyce Nussbaum’s filings →

More from the funding graph