Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert T Keeler Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$3.7MPhilanthropy$1.0MHealth$980kArts & Culture$955kEducation$828kRecreation & Sports$188kInternational$168kCommunity Improvement$151kCrime & Legal$132kOther$2.5M
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $365k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $904k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORS LINK CORP$150,000
JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER$100,000
SUNRISE OPPORTUNITIES INC$80,000
PBJ FAMILY SERVICES INC$80,000
LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$75,000
DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS$75,000
PEGASUS LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN$70,000
NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC$66,000
READING QUEST$58,400
NEIGHBORS LINK CORP$50,000
FILM PRISE JR NM$50,000
TRUE KID 1$50,000
PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION U$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$40,000
A REASON TO SURVIVE$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $170k → 18%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $10k → 9%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $110k → 11%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $166k → 18%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $10k → 9%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $130k → 18%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $5k → 9%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $90k → 11%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $110k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100k → 18%DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $75k → 11%THINK NEW MEXICO: $5k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $75k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $66k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $59k → 18%INSIDE OUT: $21k → 18%AMPARO: $35k → 14%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $25k → 16%AMPARO: $30k → 14%AMPARO: $28k → 14%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $215k → 9%AMPARO: $25k → 14%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $100k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $200k → 9%AMPARO: $15k → 14%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $95k → 18%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $80k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $190k → 9%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $75k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $190k → 9%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC: $66k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $190k → 9%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $45k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $35k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $190k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $170k → 9%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $35k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $150k → 9%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $30k → 18%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $50k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $50k → 9%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $25k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $25k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $15k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $15k → 18%INSIDE OUT RECOVERY: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
AZ
NM
DC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.5M · 62 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
17

Total granted

$9.5M
$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NEIGHBORS LINK CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +274%
  • SO
    Sunrise Opportunities
    8× · 2017–2024 · $875k · revenue +60%
  • LC
    LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $875k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • H4
    HM 43
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • CY
    Cincinnati Youth Collaborative
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +21%
  • AC
    ARTS COUNCIL SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
2
New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks

Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.

—
3
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
4
Child & Family Services Inc of Lea County

To provide a high-quality, comprehensive literacy-rich child development program and pro-family system of services and supports primarily to children and families who are economically disadvantaged, which results in children who are…

Human Services
5
New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children

The New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children (NMAEYC) is a statewide nonprofit dedicated to advancing early childhood education. We support educators, families, and communities through professional development, advocacy,…

Education
6
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
7
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
8
Community Partnership for Child Development

Cpcd's programs are based on the comprehensive head start model and are child and family-focused. cpcd adopts a two-generation approach that focuses on creating opportunities for, and addressing the needs of, both vulnerable young children…

Education
9
Help-New Mexico Inc

Help-new mexico, inc. exists to empower positive action through sustainable social services. inspire and motivate through effective community improvement programs and to educate families and communities through innovative coaching.

—
10
Enlace Comunitario

To work to eliminate domestic violence in the latino immigrant community and to promote healthy families through comprehensive domestic violence intervention services in spanish, preventative community education policy advocacy and…

Community Improvement
11
La Vida Felicidad Inc

Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.

—
12
Cooking With Kids Inc

Cooking with kids educates and empowers children and families to make healthy food choices through hands-on nutrition education with fresh, affordable foods.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Amparo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity Arts CentersElementary Literacy TutoringDomestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/61
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,504

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/58
Grantees still filing
44/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $1,595,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORPLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $874,590 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICESNONVIOLENCE WORKS INC — $416,000 · Human ServicesNONVIOLENCE WORKS INCDOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $275,000 · Human ServicesDOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INCCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC — $215,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INCAMPARO — $132,500 · Human Services+6 more — $166,500 · Human ServicesPBJ FAMILY SERVICES INC — $766,000 · OtherPBJ FAMILY SERVICES INCWASHINGTON HANCOCK COMMUNITY AGENCY — $305,000 · OtherWASHINGTON HANCOCK COMMUNITY AG…FILM PRISE JR NM — $145,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $140,000 · OtherTRUE KID 1 — $123,000 · OtherNORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL — $115,000 · OtherQUESTBRIDGE — $110,000 · OtherSacred Valley Project Inc — $163,000 · OtherSacred Valley Project IncWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC — $121,300 · OtherPegasus Legal Services for Children — $132,000 · OtherYouth Heartline — $110,000 · Other+32 more — $758,263 · Other+32 moreNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $586,600 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $135,000 · PhilanthropyALBUQUERQU…THE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $106,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TAOS C…CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $65,000 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AN…SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $58,981 · PhilanthropySANTA FE C…GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $50,000 · PhilanthropySunrise Opportunities — $875,000 · HealthSunrise Op…NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 · HealthFIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC — $45,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $652,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURN…FRACTURED ATLAS INC — $152,750 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED …A Reason To Survive — $120,000 · Arts & CultureA Reason T…+1 more — $30,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $250,230 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $135,000 · EducationKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $113,651 · EducationCHAPPAQUA SUMMER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM — $110,000 · EducationREADING QUEST — $60,900 · EducationCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $40,000 · EducationCIVIC LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationWALDEN FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · EducationKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $30,000 · Education+2 more — $18,500 · EducationTwirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc — $86,000 · Recreation & SportsMORRY'S CAMP INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsField Institute of Taos — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTAOS SPORTS ALLIANCE — $21,800 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$3,674,590Other$2,988,563Philanthropy$1,001,581Health$980,000Arts & Culture$954,750Education$828,281Recreation & Sports$187,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $1,595,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetSunrise Opportunities — $875,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $874,590 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $652,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $586,600 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetNONVIOLENCE WORKS INC — $416,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetWASHINGTON HANCOCK COMMUNITY AGENCY — $305,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $275,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $250,230 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC — $215,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetSacred Valley Project Inc — $163,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $152,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMPARO — $132,500 over 5y, 34% of budgetPegasus Legal Services for Children — $132,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC — $121,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA Reason To Survive — $120,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL — $115,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $113,651 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPPAQUA SUMMER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM — $110,000 over 8y, 33% of budgetYouth Heartline — $110,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $106,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTwirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc — $86,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetREADING QUEST — $60,900 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $58,981 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMORRY'S CAMP INC — $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) — $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetFIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUPSPRING — $45,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $40,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetInside Out — $36,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCouncil for a Strong America — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWALDEN FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO — $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLUBEC COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetARTS COUNCIL SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetField Institute of Taos — $30,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC — $28,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT — $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetStreet Safe New Mexico — $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetEvery Child Succeeds — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF TAOS — $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds Sunrise Opportunities ↗
  • Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NONVIOLENCE WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HANCOCK COMMUNITY AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds DOWNEAST COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sacred Valley Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMPARO ↗
  • Who funds Pegasus Legal Services for Children ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds A Reason To Survive ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSHIRE DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAPPAQUA SUMMER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Youth Heartline ↗
  • Who funds THE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Twirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds READING QUEST ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MORRY'S CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
  • Who funds PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…The Taos Community Fo…Los Alamos National L…Brindle FoundationNusenda FoundationMarshall L and Perrin…Reed Family Foundatio…Thornburg FoundationAnchorum St VincentCon Alma Health Found…Anchorum Health Found…Lor Foundation Inc
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM40.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Brindle Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Reed Family Foundation Inc · Thornburg Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Anchorum Health Foundation · Lor Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert T Keeler Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Northshire Day School — 39% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert T Keeler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert T Keeler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines