Skip to content
Robbinsdale Women's Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Robbinsdale Women's Center

Empowering individuals in crisis.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$268kHuman Services$135kInternational$73kHealth$73kEducation$27kCivil Rights$11k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $74,066, the rows itemized in this filing. The $114,759 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,693 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$9,566
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA$13,500
CENTER FOR CLIENT SAFETY (REPROTECTION INC)$12,000
PRO-LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES INC$10,000
HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$9,566
40 DAYS FOR LIFE$9,000
ATTWN (AND THEN THERE WERE NONE)$8,000
NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES$6,000
MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEARTLINE MINISTRIES: $6k → 11%TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA: $23k → 11%TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA: $15k → 11%CRADLE OF HOPE: $8k → 14%TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA: $14k → 11%CRADLE OF HOPE: $6k → 14%TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA: $13k → 11%TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IN
CA
KY
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$531k · 13 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$531k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+52%

Still filing today

85%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCivil RightsReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TAKE CHARGE MINNESOTA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +14%
  • PM
    PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +94%
  • MF
    MINNESOTA FAMILY COUNCIL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • PA
    PROLIFE ACROSS AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +68%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +52%
  • BI
    BALM IN GILEAD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Wels Lutherans for Life Metro Milwaukee Inc

Protecting a child's right to live and be loved by loving moms and dads.

Civil Rights
3
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
4
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
5
Center for Pregnancy Choices Metro Area

The organization's mission is to honor god's standard of the sanctity of human life by empowering women facing unplanned pregnancies to choose life.

Health
6
Choose Life of North Alabama Inc

Our mission is to offer gospel-focused, life-affirming choices, education and compassionate counsel to those facing pregnancy related decisions.

—
7
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
8
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
9
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
10
Americans United for Life Inc

AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.

Civil Rights
11
My Choices Dba Obria Medical Clinics Pnw

To share the truth and love of Jesus Christ in conjunction with a ministry to those facing pregnancy related issues: a pregnant womens' counseling program, a free pregnancy testing program, a maternity support (baby supplies, clothing and…

Health
12
Prolove Ministries

Our mission is to connect resources to help identify blind spots in the pro-life movement and unite passion and vision to provide comprehensive strategies that work to promote the value of all life, regardless of stage of development,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Heartbeat International Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINNESOTA FAMILY COUNCIL: $50,918 · OtherMINNESOTA FAMILY COUNCILPro-Life Action Ministries Inc: $50,856 · OtherPro-Life Action Ministries IncEVERLASTING LIGHT MINISTRIES: $28,783 · OtherEVERLASTING LIGHT MINISTRIESASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS: $17,500 · OtherASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICI…NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES: $16,633 · OtherNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICESBALM IN GILEAD: $10,000 · OtherBALM IN GILEAD+1 more: $6,000 · OtherHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $73,418 · HealthHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL …Center for Client Safety Inc: $55,007 · HealthCenter for Client Safety…TAKE CHARGE MINNESOTA: $69,638 · Human ServicesTAKE CHARGE MINNESOTAAnd Then There Were None: $29,712 · Human ServicesAnd Then There Were No…Cradle of Hope: $13,033 · Human ServicesCradle of HopeHEARTLINE MINISTRIES: $5,597 · Human Services40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $45,104 · Education40 DAYS FOR L…Hope United Community Development Corporation: $26,981 · EducationHope United C…PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC: $53,822 · ReligionPASSIONLIF…PROLIFE ACROSS AMERICA: $13,949 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $10,597 · Civil RightsMINNESOTA KNIGHTS FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Philanthropy
Other$180,690Health$128,425Human Services$117,980Education$72,085Religion$53,822Civil Rights$24,546Philanthropy$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $73,418 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTAKE CHARGE MINNESOTA: $69,638 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCenter for Client Safety Inc: $55,007 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetPASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC: $53,822 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMINNESOTA FAMILY COUNCIL: $50,918 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetPro-Life Action Ministries Inc: $50,856 over 5y, 1.6% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $45,104 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAnd Then There Were None: $29,712 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHope United Community Development Corporation: $26,981 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS: $17,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES: $16,633 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROLIFE ACROSS AMERICA: $13,949 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCradle of Hope: $13,033 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $10,597 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA KNIGHTS FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetMINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTLINE MINISTRIES: $5,597 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Christian Community F…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Catholic Community Foundation of MinnesotaMN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robbinsdale Women's Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robbinsdale Women's Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robbinsdale Women's Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home