· Public charity
Robbinsdale Women's Center
Empowering individuals in crisis.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $74,066 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $114,759 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,693 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAKECHARGE MINNESOTA | $13,500 |
| CENTER FOR CLIENT SAFETY (REPROTECTION INC) | $12,000 |
| PRO-LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES INC | $10,000 |
| HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | $9,566 |
| 40 DAYS FOR LIFE | $9,000 |
| ATTWN (AND THEN THERE WERE NONE) | $8,000 |
| MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE | $6,000 |
| NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTAKE CHARGE MINNESOTA5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +14%
- CFCenter for Client Safety Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +27%
- PMPASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC5× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- PAPROLIFE ACROSS AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +68%
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +52%- BIBALM IN GILEADone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…
Protecting a child's right to live and be loved by loving moms and dads.
Our mission is to offer gospel-focused, life-affirming choices, education and compassionate counsel to those facing pregnancy related decisions.
Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.
AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.
To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.
Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.
The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.
To educate the public about abortion
Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.
Kansans for Life, Inc. is a nonprofit advocacy and educational organization dedicated to protecting and defending the right to life of all innocent humans from the moment of conception to natural death.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life and the most unlike its peers is Take Charge Minnesota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAKE CHARGE MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Center for Client Safety Inc ↗
- Who funds PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FAMILY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Pro-Life Action Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds And Then There Were None ↗
- Who funds Hope United Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PROLIFE ACROSS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Cradle of Hope ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA KNIGHTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEARTLINE MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robbinsdale Women's Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.