Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rite-Hite Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$589k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$1.8MArts & Culture$1.8MHealth$763kCrime & Legal$667kHuman Services$312kPhilanthropy$271kCommunity Improvement$129kInternational$94kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $357k
$3,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA - ANGOLA IN$140,000
MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION$100,000
PI SIGMA EPSILON NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$60,000
ALL-IN-MILWAUKEE$56,500
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL$30,000
DUBUQUE INITIATIVES$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$18,000
MID MICHIGAN COLLEGE$15,000
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$15,000
EBENEZER CHILDCARE CENTERS$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$10,000
CHICO STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
FROEDTERT COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER$5,000
MATERIAL HANDLING INSTITUTE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 9%MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1k → 10%LIFES CONNECTION - MUKWONAGO CENTER INC: $2k → 5%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $3k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $3k → 12%CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10k → 17%SHARP LITERACY INC: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $10k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE: $1k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE: $1k → 17%SERENITY INNS INC: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $250 → 17%JOURNEYS HOUSE INC: $1k → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $800 → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $500 → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $500 → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $500 → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $500 → 17%INDEPENDENCE FIRST: $500 → 17%JOURNEYS HOUSE INC: $500 → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $11k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1k → 17%HEARTLOVE PLACE INC: $1k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1k → 17%EBENEZER CHILDCARE CENTERS: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE: $500 → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
WY
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 90 repeat orgs$814k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 85 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
88

Total granted

$5.4M
$310k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+25%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $504k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $705k · revenue +8%
  • WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $648k · revenue +217%
  • FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $647k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • VW
    VERSITI WISCONSIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +77%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • TR
    THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
5
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
10
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green Lake Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesDance Arts OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Equine Therapy ProgramsLocal History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and ShelterLocal Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Policy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%1%<5yr12%4%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr19%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr16%6%35–55yr19%69%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/154
the rest of the field
8%
3,021/36,372

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

145 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 145 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
142/145
Grantees still filing
101/145
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,116,100 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC — $647,300 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC+14 more — $55,111 · Arts & CultureCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC — $705,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INCTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION — $525,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILW…ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $156,000 · EducationALL-IN MILWAUKEE INCTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $121,500 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCON…+9 more — $97,750 · Education+9 moreYMCA - ANGOLA IN — $140,000 · OtherYMCA - ANGOLA INYMCA - DOOR COUNTY — $75,000 · OtherYMCA - DOOR COUNTYUNITED WAY OF DUBUQUE — $73,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DUBUQUEPI SIGMA EPSILON NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · OtherWISCONSIN BREAST CANCER SHOWHOUSE — $50,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE - COVID-19 FUND — $49,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $62,000 · Other+116 more — $671,450 · Other+116 moreVERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $253,100 · HealthVERSITI BLOOD…PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $189,850 · HealthPENFIELD CHIL…VERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $40,000 · HealthVERSITI WISCO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $31,000 · HealthTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN VALOR FOUNDATION — $26,000 · Health+20 more — $151,000 · Health+20 moreWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY — $648,200 · Crime & LegalWISCONSIN IN…+1 more — $11,500 · Crime & LegalMMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementDUBUQUE INITIATIVES — $25,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $4,000 · Community ImprovementAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesSERENITY INNS INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEBENEZER CHILD CARE CENTERS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $6,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENCE FIRST INC — $3,300 · Human Services+8 more — $11,100 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$1,818,511Education$1,605,250Other$1,180,450Health$720,950Crime & Legal$659,700Community Improvement$129,000Human Services$95,400

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,116,100 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC — $705,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY — $648,200 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC — $647,300 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION — $525,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetVERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $253,100 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $189,850 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $156,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $121,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $62,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPI SIGMA EPSILON NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetPHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $41,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE — $35,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN VALOR FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUBUQUE INITIATIVES — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDR MIRIAM AND SHELDON G ADELSON EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE — $24,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPhoenix Cancer Support Network — $23,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $20,011 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSafe & Sound Inc — $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC — $11,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFINLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION SCHOOL ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEBENEZER CHILD CARE CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPATHWAYS HIGH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC — $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABCD INC — $8,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…Greater Milwaukee Fou…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Green Bay Packers Fou…Anon Charitable TrustSixsibs Foundation IncJoseph and Vera Zilbe…Ralph Evinrude Founda…Evan & Marion Helfaer…Milwaukee Jewish Fede…Baird Foundation IncHarley-Davidson Found…
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI84.5× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Sixsibs Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rite-Hite Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rite-Hite Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rite-Hite Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines