Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Food & Nutrition$4.3MCommunity Improvement$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.5MEducation$1.4MYouth Development$1.4MArts & Culture$1.0MHuman Services$986kHealth$914kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $459k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNGER TASK FORCE OF MILWAUKEE$500,000
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN$250,000
MILWAUKEE PARK FOUNDATION INC$118,800
NEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS$110,000
CLEVER SAUCE CREATIVE LLC$104,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY$76,252
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$17,100
BETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI$12,500
LABOR COMMUNITY AT WORK$10,000
ART INTERSECTION MKE$10,000
THE RESOURCE FOUNDATION$6,300
MIAD$6,000
1 SOLDIER 1 DOG 1 TEAM$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $689k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hoffman Homes Inc: $10k → 17%Independence First Inc: $5k → 14%1 SOLDIER 1 DOG 1 TEAM: $5k → 6%Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $10k → 17%Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center: $5k → 14%Cradles to Crayons Chicago: $5k → 14%Jewish Community Centre Of York Pennsylvania: $5k → 9%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $5k → 14%YMCA Of Metropolitan Chicago: $5k → 14%YMCA Of Metropolitan Chicago: $5k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $5k → 14%New Hope Ministries Inc: $7k → 9%New Hope Ministries Inc: $5k → 9%SHARP Literacy Inc: $15k → 17%Make A Difference Wisconsin Inc: $12k → 17%SHARP Literacy Inc: $10k → 17%SHARP Literacy Inc: $10k → 17%YMCA of York & York County: $8k → 9%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee Inc: $5k → 17%Neighborhood House of Milwaukee Inc: $5k → 17%St Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Inc: $5k → 17%Hospice & Community Care: $10k → 9%Hospice & Community Care: $5k → 9%Milwaukee Community Business Collaborative Inc: $30k → 17%YMCA of Metropolitan Milwaukee: $51k → 17%SecureFutures: $12k → 17%Make A Difference Wisconsin Inc: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Center for Independence: $15k → 17%American National Red Cross: $30k → 17%American National Red Cross: $20k → 17%American National Red Cross: $15k → 17%Milwaukee Center for Independence: $15k → 17%Milwaukee Center for Independence: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Center for Independence: $10k → 17%Journey House: $10k → 17%Journey House: $10k → 17%United Community Center: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Urban League: $48k → 17%Milwaukee Urban League: $30k → 17%Milwaukee Urban League: $25k → 17%Milwaukee Urban League: $25k → 17%Sojourner Family Peace Center Inc: $20k → 17%Sojourner Family Peace Center Inc: $20k → 17%Sojourner Family Peace Center Inc: $15k → 17%Pathfinders Milwaukee Inc: $15k → 17%Pathfinders Milwaukee Inc: $10k → 17%YWCA Southeast Wisconsin: $10k → 17%Pathfinders Milwaukee Inc: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 177 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

177 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 163 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

177
222

Total granted

$16M
$992k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

72%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $402k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HUNGER TASK FORCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +70%
  • NW
    NEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +351% · 39% of their budget
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue -36%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $51k · revenue -9%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF YORK COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
2
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
Employ Milwaukee Inc

The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
6
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
11
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
12
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Center for Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Three Rivers United Temporary Housing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Equine Therapy ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterLocal History MuseumsCommunity Food PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…School District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Health Access Advocacy and …Developmental Disabilities …Elementary Literacy TutoringDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportYouth Development CentersCommunity Arts CentersUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%1%<5yr12%7%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr19%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr16%43%35–55yr19%27%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%2/303
the rest of the field
8%
3,021/36,223

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

285 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 285 of the 436 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
276/285
Grantees still filing
202/285
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $4,049,645 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCChildren's Wisconsin Foundation — $487,819 · Other+124 more — $5,200,359 · Other+124 moreNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC — $2,081,100 · Community ImprovementNEAR WEST SIDE …MILWAUKEE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementMILWAUKEE DEVEL…+5 more — $171,000 · Community Improvement+5 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,591,727 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $100,000 · PhilanthropyASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyBrewers Community Foundation Inc — $75,000 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP — $72,500 · Philanthropy+4 more — $94,475 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIZSTARTS MILWAUKEE INC — $37,500 · Youth Development+4 more — $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $258,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $110,000 · Arts & CultureBETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $98,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $71,000 · Arts & CultureGPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD — $42,500 · Arts & CultureFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE — $35,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE — $133,250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc — $50,600 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesSHARP LITERACY INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesJOBSWORK MKE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $30,000 · Human Services+13 more — $141,973 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $512,181 · HealthBROADSCOPE DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $41,500 · HealthSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $30,000 · Health+6 more — $68,144 · Health
Other$9,737,823Community Improvement$2,452,100Philanthropy$2,108,702Youth Development$1,063,500Arts & Culture$810,000Human Services$664,823Health$651,825

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $4,049,645 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC — $2,081,100 over 8y, 39% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $1,591,727 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $512,181 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $313,227 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $258,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $237,600 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetCenter for Veterans Issues Inc — $225,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $200,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $174,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $170,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE — $133,250 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $129,588 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC — $118,640 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $110,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $110,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBETTY BRINN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $98,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE — $91,885 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE — $90,725 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPearls for Teen Girls Inc — $80,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $75,825 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $75,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBrewers Community Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLISTEN FIRST PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SOUTH COLLIN COUNTY — $75,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWISCONSIN REGIONAL TRAINING PARTNERSHIP — $72,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $71,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $67,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGPS EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY — $55,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YORK COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL — $45,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD — $42,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROADSCOPE DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $41,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLABOR COMMUNITY AT WORK INC — $40,000 over 4y, 37% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Fou…United Way of Greater…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Green Bay Packers Fou…Evan & Marion Helfaer…Ralph Evinrude Founda…Joseph and Vera Zilbe…Waukesha County Commu…Anon Charitable TrustGardner FoundationMilwaukee Jewish Fede…Youth Foundation Inc
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI104.7× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Gardner Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
74report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 436 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home