· Private foundation
Rio Vista Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PONGO FUND | $13,500 |
| VETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $2,500 |
| DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC | $1,000 |
| MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS RESEARCH | $1,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK INC | $750 |
| BETHLEHEM INN | $500 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES | $500 |
| SKY DOG SANCTUARY INC | $500 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $500 |
| 15-10 FOUNDATION | $500 |
| BEND THE ARC-A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE | $250 |
| GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $250 |
| BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT | $250 |
| BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PONGO FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +57%
- DLDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +177%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC6× · 2019–2024 · $13k · revenue ×11
Funded once
- MSMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUTone grant, 2022 · $4k
VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +38%- PAPEN AMERICAN CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Our mission is to encourage facilitate support and engage in scientific investigation and research experimentation and to advance educational and training activities related to agriculture and natural resources throughout the state of…
Oregon journalism project's mission is to inform, engage, and empower oregonians with the kind of data-driven and solution-seeking investigative reporting that makes a significant impact at the state and local levels - serving no agenda…
The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Katmai Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PONGO FUND ↗
- Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds VETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds High Desert Food & Farm Alliance ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES ↗
- Who funds SKY DOG SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds FREE GEEK ↗
- Who funds CENTURION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Pixie Project Inc ↗
- Who funds LYRIC THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND ↗
- Who funds Katmai Conservancy ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · D27 Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · St Charles Health System Inc · The Jackson Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rio Vista Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- High Desert Food & Farm Alliance — 45% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center — 11% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
- Free Geek — 5% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades — 3% of income from government
- Klcc Public Radio Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.