· Private foundation
D27 Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $400k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST | $750,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION IN | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR HUMANE TECHNOLOGY | $25,000 |
| BRIDGEUSA GROUP | $25,000 |
| COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| CIVICS LEARNING PROJECT | $25,000 |
| INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| TIDELINES INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| OREGON BALLET THEATRE | $25,000 |
| FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE & RACISM INC | $15,000 |
| ADOPT ONE BLOCK | $15,000 |
| ONE TAIL AT A TIME - PDX | $15,000 |
| NORTH COAST LAND CONSERVANCY INC | $10,000 |
| TAX FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SARAH MCLACHLAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC SOC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
89 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $360k · revenue +149%
- CLCivics Learning Project5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +31%
- CFCenter for Humane Technology5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- TFTHE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCYgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +89%
- PPSFCone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -41%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Connecting people across oregon and the pacific northwest through the power of a shared story.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1000 Friends of Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
117 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 117 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds Civics Learning Project ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds TIDELINES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Center for Humane Technology ↗
- Who funds THE CUPCAKE GIRLS ↗
- Who funds OREGON BALLET THEATRE ↗
- Who funds Adopt One Block ↗
- Who funds Oregon Crime Victims Law Center ↗
- Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BridgeUSA Group ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND VA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
- Who funds FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds Healing Advocacy Fund ↗
- Who funds North Coast Land Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds CONFLUENCES INC CONFLUENCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Braver AngelsInc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTLAB ↗
- Who funds ONE TAIL AT A TIME - PDX ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SARAH MCLACHLAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND PIANO INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE BELONG PDX ↗
- Who funds ECKHART TOLLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHARITABLE ↗
- Who funds Magic Canoe ↗
- Who funds THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds HETERODOX ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION AGAINST INTOLERANCE & RACISM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization D27 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
- Oregon Crime Victims Law Center — 100% of income from government
- LArche Portland — 59% of income from government
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- Portland Va Research Foundation — 34% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
- North Coast Land Conservancy Inc — 6% of income from government
- Portland Institute for Contemporary Art — 5% of income from government
- Solve — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- White Bird — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Caldera — 1% of income from government
- Portland Youth Philharmonic Association — 0% of income from government
- In a Landscape — 0% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- All Classical Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to D27 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to D27 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.