· Private foundation
Riggs Benevolent Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k60 grants · $191k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $433k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| HEART OF ARKANSAS UNITED WAY | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK | $29,700 |
| OUR HOUSE | $27,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA | $27,000 |
| WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST | $25,000 |
| TEAM RED WHITE AND BLUE | $25,000 |
| MISSION CLINICAL SERVICES | $25,000 |
| GOODNESS VILLAGE | $20,000 |
| CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH | $20,000 |
| CARTI CANCER CENTER | $20,000 |
| YOUTH HOME INC | $17,000 |
| QUAPAW AREA COUNCIL | $17,000 |
| CALS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| IMMERSE ARKANSAS | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $328k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +345%
- HOHEART OF ARKANSAS UNITED WAY4× · 2022–2025 · $165k · revenue +204%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $144k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Arkansas Foundationone grant, 2021 · $37k
- AMArkansas Museum of Fine Artsone grant, 2021 · $30k
- AHArkansas Hospice Foundationone grant, 2021 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education
To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…
Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.
Education & leadership training to improve patient care.
To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history
To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.
Teaching work skills and daily living skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.
Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.
Arkansas health care association was organized for the following purposes: (a) to maintain high standard of quality care and administration of nursing homes and similar health care facilities, (b) to create greater opportunities for the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is JAMES127 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KIWANIS ACTIVITIES OF LITTLE ROCK KIWANIS ACTIVITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ARKANSAS UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSION CLINICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CARTI Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EASTERN CONGO INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds VERA LLOYD PRESBYTERIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds SULTANA HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds GOODNESS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRIX COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Brown Foundation · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation · Lpr Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Sally & Keith Riggs Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Riggs Benevolent Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.