· Private foundation
Lpr Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| PROJECT ZERO | $150,000 |
| ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| PARK | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS | $20,000 |
| UAMS FOUNDATION FUND | $13,000 |
| PULASKI HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST | $10,000 |
| ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS | $10,000 |
| ARKANSAS STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $831k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +54%
- PCPULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO9× · 2017–2025 · $694k · revenue +157%
- ECEPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL3× · 2022–2024 · $86k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- BFBPS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- PCPURE CHARITYone grant, 2020 · $52k
- IAIMMERSE ARKANSASone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history
The foundation's mission is to broaden and enhance educational and employment opportunities for persons with visual impairments.
The Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History was established to help further the mission of the Division of Arkansas Heritage; to identify Arkansass Heritage and enhance the quality of life by the discovery,preservation and…
The selection, recognition, and acknowledgement of those who throughout outstanding achievement in any form of sport have brought honor and prestige to Arkansas
To promote and develop the growth of tennis.
Parks and Recreation Foundation of Arkansas is organized to support, protect, enhance and add value to places that provide exceptional recreation experience and build on the legacy of the civilian conservation corps by providing a conduit…
Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.
The organization promotes educational activities which foster entrepreneurial development in arkansas with the goal of increasing business startup creation and leadership development.
Arkansas farm bureau foundation (the "foundation") is organized for charitable and educational purposes to further the understanding of agricultural and rural issues, and to support the agricultural and rural community through financial…
To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds PARK Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THEA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds BRANDON BURLSWORTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS MOCK TRIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC ARKANSAS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HAT CLUB ↗
- Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GERMANTOWN CHARITY HORSE SHOW ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Arvest Foundation · The Hussman Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Brown Foundation · Bass Family Charitable Foundation · Trinity Foundation · George H Dunklin Jr Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lpr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.