Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rich Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MYouth Development$700kEducation$425kInternational$231kArts & Culture$60kHealth$57kHuman Services$38kRecreation & Sports$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $192k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Archdiocese of Los Angeles$32,000
USC$29,583
Boys & Girls Club of LA Harbor$25,000
Franciscan University of Stuebenville$25,000
Sharefest Community Development$20,000
The Messy Family Project$20,000
The Abana Foundation$10,709
Mary Star of the Sea High School$10,000
Net Ministries Inc$10,000
Maria's Closet$10,000
The Beacon House Association of San Pedro$7,000
Friends of Cabrillo Marine Museum$5,000
Harbor Area Booster Association$2,500
San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild$2,500
Partners of Parks$1,873
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Golden Heart Ranch: $520 → 10%MOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%Mountain Shadows Foundation: $3k → 11%THE OBRIA GROUP INC: $17k → 10%Sharefest Community Development: $20k → 14%Sharefest Community Development Inc: $5k → 14%Sharefest Community Development Inc: $3k → 14%Maria's Closet: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
OR
IN
OH
CA
KY
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 29 repeat orgs$607k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
26

Total granted

$2.0M
$563k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

52%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LIFE TEEN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $380k · revenue +99%
  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
    4× · 2019–2023 · $110k · revenue +26%
  • TA
    THE ABANA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +33%
  • S
    SOULFORMATION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • NE
    NEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
2
Filipino Cursillos in Christianity La
Religion
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Pepperdine University

Pepperdine university is a christian university committed to the highest standards of academic excellence and christian values, where students are strengthened for lives of purpose, service, and leadership. see schedule o for more…

Education
5
Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio

As a catholic university sponsored by the sisters of divine providence, our lady of the lake university is a community whose members are committed to serve students by: (continued on schedule o).

Education
6
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
7
Sisters of St Benedict of Riverside Ca

Proclaim the gospel by embracing a monastic way of life in the spirit of st. benedict and scholastica, the norms of the federation of st. gertrude, and our monastic norms.we are a vibrant community choosing to make a positive difference in…

—
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
Sancta Maria Hospital Inc

Faithful to the spirit of the congregation of the daughters of mary, sancta maria nursing facility's mission is to witness christ's compassion, caring and love, reflecting the catholic church's role in the continuation of christ's healing…

—
10
Westfield Residence Inc

To provide facilities as residence and cultural center for high school, college, and professional women through the conduct of intellect and cultural seminars in helping the women exert a positive influence in whatever environment they…

Human Services
11
Union Rescue Mission

Union rescue mission embraces people with the compassion of christ. we assist people experiencing homelessness by providing a comprehensive array of emergency and long-term services to our guests, including: food, shelter, clothing,…

Human Services
12
Mount Saint Mary's University

See schedule o.mount saint mary's university offers a dynamic learning experience in liberal arts & sciences to a diverse student body. as a catholic university founded primarily for women, we are dedicated to providing superior education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franciscan University of Steubenville; the most unlike its peers is Orphans Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFE TEEN INC: $380,000 · OtherLIFE TEEN INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA: $282,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LABoys & Girls Club of LA Harbor: $255,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of LA HarborUSC: $209,465 · OtherUSCBoys Girls Club of LA Harbor: $116,500 · OtherBoys Girls Club of LA HarborNational Eucharistic Congress Inc: $100,000 · OtherNational Eucharistic Congress IncMARY OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $72,320 · OtherChurch Resource Ministries: $66,000 · Other+32 more: $382,054 · Other+32 moreCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $150,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNI…THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $110,000 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC …FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $55,000 · EducationFRANCISCAN UN…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationSOULFORMATION: $100,000 · ReligionSOULFORMA…NEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $75,000 · ReligionNEAR EAST…MESSY FAMILY PROJECT: $30,000 · ReligionMESSY FAM…THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $20,000 · ReligionTHE DYNAM…THE ABANA FOUNDATION: $69,313 · PhilanthropySAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD: $7,500 · PhilanthropySharefest Community Development Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesMARIA S CLOSET INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $7,280 · Human Services+1 more: $520 · Human ServicesKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $36,800 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $525 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,863,839Education$317,000Religion$225,000Philanthropy$76,813Human Services$62,800Youth Development$39,300Housing & Shelter$25,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFE TEEN INC: $380,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOULFORMATION: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ABANA FOUNDATION: $69,313 over 8y, 15% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $36,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMESSY FAMILY PROJECT: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSharefest Community Development Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO: $22,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF CABRILLO AQUARIUM: $12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFeed My Poor Inc: $10,525 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD: $7,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $7,280 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS OF PARKS: $3,373 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCabrillo Beach Boosters Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAN PEDRO GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOMES FOR FAMILIES: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFE TEEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SOULFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds NEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ABANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds MESSY FAMILY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Sharefest Community Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE OBRIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CABRILLO AQUARIUM ↗
  • Who funds Feed My Poor Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARIA S CLOSET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN PEDRO PENINSULA CANCER GUILD ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farmers & Merchants Bank FoundationCA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Foster Charitable Trust · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rich Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rich Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rich Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rich Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph