Skip to content
Rexel Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Rexel Foundation Inc

The rexel foundation's purpose is to improve and impact the lives of the people and communities it serves across the country through community investment and support, disease-focused research, and emergency disaster relief.

$606k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$988kFood & Nutrition$45kHousing & Shelter$36kPhilanthropy$31kHuman Services$24kCommunity Improvement$16kArts & Culture$10kInternational$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $465,488, the rows itemized in this filing. The $605,969 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $140,481 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$456k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHSU Knight Cancer Foundation$251,952
University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Institute$100,946
Las Vegas Rescue Mission$15,000
Latin American Association$14,390
The Navy Seal Foundation$10,000
Aspire Higher Foundation$10,000
Make-A-Wish Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana$10,000
Ainsley's Angels$10,000
Cast Hope$9,000
National Jewish Health$8,500
Community Foundation of Greenville$7,500
Breakthrough T1D$6,700
Brett's Place$6,000
Community Action Partnership of Orange County$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Latin American Association: $14k → 27%Las Vegas Rescue Mission: $15k → 13%Ainsley's Angels: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NV
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
SC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$864k · 5 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$864k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $780k · revenue +100%
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +42%
  • AA
    AINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • CD
    CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SO
    SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
Creighton Community Foundation

Creighton community foundation's (ccf) core program "community works" leverages neighborhood schools to support vibrant communities in the poorest parts of urban phoenix, where neighborhoods suffer from poverty- driven disadvantage and…

Philanthropy
3
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
5
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
6
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
7
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
9
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
12
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $780,049 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUniversity of Miami: $100,946 · EducationUniversity of MiamiLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $30,000 · Human ServicesAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $20,000 · Human ServicesROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $14,390 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $6,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC: $17,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $16,500 · HealthSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,700 · HealthBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC: $10,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK: $7,200 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank: $6,375 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $6,375 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $21,500 · PhilanthropyCAST HOPE: $9,000 · PhilanthropyHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,850 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING ALABAMA: $5,600 · Food & NutritionFEEDING GEORGIA INC: $5,250 · Food & NutritionASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $6,000 · International
Education$880,995Human Services$90,390Health$56,700Other$45,450Philanthropy$30,500Food & Nutrition$24,700Arts & Culture$20,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $780,049 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $100,946 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $14,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAST HOPE: $9,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING ALABAMA: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING GEORGIA INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Enterprise Holdings F…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rexel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rexel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rexel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rexel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rexel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home