Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rexel Foundation Inc

The rexel foundation's purpose is to improve and impact the lives of the people and communities it serves across the country through community investment and support, disease-focused research, and emergency disaster relief.

$606k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$988kFood & Nutrition$45kHousing & Shelter$36kPhilanthropy$31kHuman Services$24kCommunity Improvement$16kArts & Culture$10kInternational$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $465,488 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $605,969 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $140,481 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$456k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHSU Knight Cancer Foundation$251,952
University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Institute$100,946
Las Vegas Rescue Mission$15,000
Latin American Association$14,390
Ainsley's Angels$10,000
Aspire Higher Foundation$10,000
The Navy Seal Foundation$10,000
Make-A-Wish Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana$10,000
Cast Hope$9,000
National Jewish Health$8,500
Community Foundation of Greenville$7,500
Breakthrough T1D$6,700
Brett's Place$6,000
Community Action Partnership of Orange County$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Latin American Association: $14k → 27%Las Vegas Rescue Mission: $15k → 13%Ainsley's Angels: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
NV
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
SC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$864k · 5 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$864k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $780k · revenue +100%
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +42%
  • AA
    AINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • CD
    CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CH
    CARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

2
Creighton Community Foundation

Creighton community foundation's (ccf) core program "community works" leverages neighborhood schools to support vibrant communities in the poorest parts of urban phoenix, where neighborhoods suffer from poverty- driven disadvantage and…

Philanthropy
3
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

5
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
6
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

7
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
9
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
12
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Veteran Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesCommunity FoundationsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr12%42%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr19%3%20–35yr12%10%35–55yr16%81%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,404

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $780,049 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUniversity of Miami — $100,946 · EducationUniversity of MiamiLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 · Human ServicesROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA — $20,000 · Human ServicesLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $14,390 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $6,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC — $17,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $16,500 · HealthSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED — $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $6,700 · HealthBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC — $10,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK — $7,200 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $6,375 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank — $6,375 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $5,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $21,500 · PhilanthropyCAST HOPE — $9,000 · PhilanthropyHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,850 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINE — $6,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING ALABAMA — $5,600 · Food & NutritionFEEDING GEORGIA INC — $5,250 · Food & NutritionNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $6,000 · International
Education$880,995Human Services$90,390Health$56,700Other$45,450Philanthropy$30,500Food & Nutrition$24,700Arts & Culture$20,000International$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $780,049 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $100,946 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION — $14,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARE HELP OF SULPHUR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAST HOPE — $9,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING ALABAMA — $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING GEORGIA INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rexel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rexel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rexel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph