Skip to content
Rewild at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rewild

Re:wild protects and restores the wild to build a thriving earth where all life flourishes.

$64M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$5.8MScience & Tech$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.6MAnimals$1.9MCommunity Improvement$750kEducation$125kFood & Nutrition$75kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 43 grants below total $3,815,997, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,558,340 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,742,343 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $423k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$60,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROUNDWORK USA$425,000
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY$300,000
SAVANNA INSTITUTE$294,961
EARTH INNOVATION INSTITUTE$245,133
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$213,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$209,325
ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM INC$186,010
AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$163,250
THE CLIMATE CENTER$140,675
AMERICAN FORESTS$130,000
PLANET WOMEN$100,000
SILVIX RESOURCES$100,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY (WCS)$97,320
NEW RIVER CONSERVANCY$80,000
CONSERVATION X LABS$76,540
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $95k → 12%ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $214k → 13%MONGABAY: $75k → 7%REVIVE & RESTORE: $300k → 8%THE CLIMATE CENTER: $141k → 9%SAMO FUND: $300k → 10%THE SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY: $100k → 7%GROUNDWORK USA: $425k → 9%TURTLE CONSERVANCY: $387k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY (WCS): $97k → 28%QUIVIRA COALITION INC: $76k → 12%AMERICAN FORESTS: $130k → 14%SAVANNA INSTITUTE: $295k → 10%OREGON DESERT LAND TRUST: $830k → 10%SILVIX RESOURCES: $100k → 12%OUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $75k → 15%YALE UNIVERSITY: $84k → 12%AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $163k → 11%SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY: $300k → 12%NEW RIVER CONSERVANCY: $80k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $102k → 9%PLANET WOMEN: $103k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $209k → 7%CAT ACTION TREASURY INC: $100k → 9%SAMO FUND: $300k → 10%SOLUTIONS PROJECT INC: $100k → 10%GROUNDWORK USA: $300k → 9%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY: $1.0M → 17%OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION INC: $93k → 10%AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $119k → 9%PLANET WOMEN: $100k → 10%CAT ACTION TREASURY INC: $100k → 9%SOLUTIONS PROJECT INC: $100k → 10%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $775k → 17%PLANET WOMEN: $100k → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $275k → 10%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $500k → 17%EARTH INNOVATION INSTITUTE: $245k → 10%TREEPEOPLE INC: $200k → 14%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $100k → 14%TREEPEOPLE INC: $200k → 14%TREEPEOPLE INC: $100k → 14%GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $100k → 14%GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $100k → 14%GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $100k → 14%GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $100k → 14%CONSERVATION X LABS: $77k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $52M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $51M to organizations and $1.0M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$34M · 65% · 115 grants · 24 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

Central America and the Caribbean$8.9M · 17% · 46 grants · 6 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

Sub-Saharan Africa$3.8M · 7% · 60 grants · 52 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

South Asia$1.9M · 4% · 17 grants · 12 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

East Asia and the Pacific$1.5M · 3% · 20 grants · 14 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.0M · 2% · 14 grants · 4 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$846k · 2% · 13 grants · 9 people

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROJECTS · GRANTEE

Middle East and North Africa$23k · 0% · 3 people

Stated purpose: GRANTEE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 38 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
31

Total granted

$7.3M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+44%

Still filing today

92%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    Santa Monica Mountains Fund
    2× · 2022–2023 · $600k · revenue +408% · 26% of their budget
  • TI
    TREEPEOPLE INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +58%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • OD
    OREGON DESERT LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $830k · revenue -13% · 39% of their budget
  • RR
    REVIVE & RESTOREgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +69%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $102k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
5
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
6
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
7
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
8
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
9
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
10
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
11
Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…

Crime & Legal
12
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Landberry Limited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/90
Grantees still filing
49/90
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON DESERT LAND TRUST: $829,634 · EnvironmentOREGON DESERT LAND TRUSTTREEPEOPLE INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentTREEPEOPLE INCGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $400,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INCCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION: $315,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR …Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $300,000 · EnvironmentSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conse…SAVANNA INSTITUTE: $294,961 · EnvironmentSAVANNA INSTITUTESolutions Project Inc: $250,000 · EnvironmentSolutions Project IncNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $213,500 · EnvironmentCAT ACTION TREASURY INC: $200,000 · Environment+22 more: $1,351,500 · Environment+22 moreROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $2,275,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROP…Earth Innovation Institute: $293,423 · PhilanthropyEarth Innovation Instit…TIDES FOUNDATION: $275,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION+3 more: $140,039 · PhilanthropySanta Monica Mountains Fund: $600,000 · OtherSanta Monica Mount…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $209,325 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERV…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $175,949 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASH…OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION: $100,638 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (MERCED): $90,553 · OtherSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $201,742 · OtherSMITHSONIAN INSTIT…+28 more: $978,856 · Other+28 moreTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $397,224 · AnimalsTURTLE CONSER…REVIVE & RESTORE: $300,000 · AnimalsREVIVE & REST…Wildlife Conservation Society: $182,320 · AnimalsWildlife Cons…GLOBAL CONSERVATION NETWORK: $148,000 · AnimalsGLOBAL CONSER…SOUTHEAST ALASKA INDIGINOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSI: $135,000 · AnimalsSOUTHEAST ALA…OMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $115,000 · AnimalsOMAHA ZOOLOGI…American Bird Conservancy: $114,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $107,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILD…CONSERVATION X LABS INC: $76,540 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $75,000 · Animals+5 more: $100,494 · Animals+5 moreENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM INC: $383,340 · EducationENVIRONMENT…AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $263,250 · EducationAUSTIN PEAY…COLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $160,000 · EducationCOLORADO PL…The Climate Center: $140,675 · EducationThe Climate…PINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC: $125,000 · EducationPINE RIDGE …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $102,376 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Yale University: $84,000 · EducationYale Univer…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $50,000 · EducationLA COMPOST: $50,000 · Education+3 more: $52,787 · EducationGROUNDWORK USA INC: $725,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $35,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $50,000 · Community ImprovementPLANET WOMEN: $303,000 · International
Environment$4,654,595Philanthropy$2,983,462Other$2,357,063Animals$1,751,078Education$1,411,428Community Improvement$885,000International$303,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $2,275,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON DESERT LAND TRUST: $829,634 over 1y, 39% of budgetGROUNDWORK USA INC: $725,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetSanta Monica Mountains Fund: $600,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $500,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $400,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $397,224 over 2y, 22% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM INC: $383,340 over 3y, 11% of budgetCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION: $315,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetPLANET WOMEN: $303,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetREVIVE & RESTORE: $300,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $300,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEarth Innovation Institute: $293,423 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $275,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $263,250 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSolutions Project Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $213,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $209,325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $201,742 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAT ACTION TREASURY INC: $200,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $182,320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $150,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY: $150,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $150,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGLOBAL CONSERVATION NETWORK: $148,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetThe Climate Center: $140,675 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALASKA INDIGINOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSI: $135,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetAmerican Forests: $130,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC: $125,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetOMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $114,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $107,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $102,376 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSILVIX RESOURCES: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetYale University: $84,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew River Conservancy: $80,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRE-VOLV: $75,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT: $75,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO CATTLEMEN'S AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA COMPOST: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER: $50,000 over 2y, 30% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leonardo Dicaprio Fou…PatagoniaorgThe Nature ConservancyThe Schmidt Family Fo…Clif Family FoundationResources Legacy FundCalifornia Community …ImpactassetsincNatural Resources Def…Rsf Social Finance IncWilburforce FoundationThe David and Lucile …
Leonardo Dicaprio FoundationCA38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leonardo Dicaprio Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Nature Conservancy · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Wilburforce Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rewild funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rewild. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Urban Wood Economy Inc: 100% of income from government
  • African Aquatic Conservation Fund Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association: 9% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rewild’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home