Skip to content

· Public charity

Reemprise Fund

Reemprise Fund is a venture philanthropy organization that invests in emerging nonprofit leaders and early-stage organizations serving historically marginalized communities in Charlotte, North Carolina.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Youth Development$220kEducation$155kHuman Services$67kCommunity Improvement$65kEmployment$60kHealth$25kArts & Culture$14k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$516k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Academy of Goal Achievers$80,000
Healing Vine Harbor$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Playing for Others: $25k → 10%Gracious Hands Trsnl Housing: $30k → 10%ourBRIDGE for KIDS: $30k → 10%ourBRIDGE for KIDS: $30k → 10%Gardhouse Limited: $30k → 10%A Brighter Day Ministries: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 3 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$410k
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Academy of Goal Achievers
    2× · 2024–2025 · $195k · revenue -7%
  • HV
    Healing Vine Harbor
    2× · 2024–2025 · $155k · revenue 0% · 30% of their budget
  • OI
    ourBRIDGE Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • GL
    GardHouse Limited
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -42%
  • SC
    SHARE Charlottegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +45%
  • FC
    FREEDOM COMMUNITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +108%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heal Charlotte

Heal Charlotte is a community based organization that provides youth development programming (in-school, after school, and summer camps), adult training workshops (financial literacy, job training), rental assistance and eviction…

Human Services
2
Families Forward Charlotte Inc

Families Forward Charlotte partners with families living in poverty in Mecklenburg County, NC. We provide individualized mentoring, educational opportunities and essential support as we walk alongside each family on their journey toward…

Human Services
3
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
4
Foster Village Charlotte

Foster Village Charlotte creates connection with dignity for children and families experiencing foster care by meeting urgent needs, providing educational and emotional support, and advocating as a collective community voice for children.

Human Services
5
Autism Charlotte

Autism Charlotte's misison is to embrace and empower children and families affected by autism. We envision a community where every family navigation autism is supported with knowledge, resources, warmth, and understanding.

Health
6
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
7
Blessings Working Together Inc

Provide counseling and life skills

Human Services
8
Black Child Development Institute-Carolinas

"Advance equity in education and child development for children and families."

Education
9
Brighter Day Recovery Inc

assisting in transforming lives

—
10
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
11
A Better World Charlotte

Service inner-city families

Recreation & Sports
12
Harvesting Hope Youth and Families Services

Harvesting Hope Youth and Families Services is a youth and family services program sowing seeds of hope in the community. We provide behavioral services, mentoring, and literacy support. We also provide community based training…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom Communities; the most unlike its peers is A Brighter Day Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Academy of Goal Achievers: $195,000 · EducationThe Academy of Goal AchieversHealing Vine Harbor: $155,000 · EducationHealing Vine HarborourBRIDGE Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesourBRIDGE IncGardHouse Limited: $60,000 · Human ServicesGardHouse LimitedPlaying For Others: $25,000 · Human ServicesPlaying For OthersA Brighter Day Ministries Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHARE Charlotte: $35,000 · Community ImprovementSHARE Charlo…FREEDOM COMMUNITIES: $30,000 · Community ImprovementFREEDOM COMM…Facts Initiative: $15,000 · HealthPROJECT 70FORWARD: $10,000 · HealthArtsPlus: $14,000 · Other
Education$350,000Human Services$152,000Community Improvement$65,000Health$25,000Other$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Academy of Goal Achievers: $195,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetHealing Vine Harbor: $155,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetourBRIDGE Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGardHouse Limited: $60,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSHARE Charlotte: $35,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFREEDOM COMMUNITIES: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPlaying For Others: $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFacts Initiative: $15,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetArtsPlus: $14,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Charlotte IncNC21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Womens Impact Fund · Merancas Foundation Inc · Ally Charitable Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reemprise Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reemprise Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Reemprise Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Reemprise Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reemprise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph