Loading…
· Public charity
Reemprise Fund
We combine a relationship-focused approach with the strategic investment mindset of venture capital.
$273k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
1
Communities
$115k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.
Education$210kHuman Services$152kCommunity Improvement$65kHealth$25kOther$14k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2023
livesincrease post-graduatepost-graduate employmentemployment amongstamongst studentsstudents colorcolor maximizing
2024
votemulti-year partnershipmental health
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $210k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$800k
Total assets
Largest grants
- The Academy of Goal Achievers$115,000
- Healing Vine Harbor$95,000
- ourBRIDGE for KIDS$30,000
- The FACTS Initiative$15,000
- Project 70Forward$10,000
- A Brighter Day Ministries$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Harvesting Hope Youth and Families Services
Providing therapy services to at-risk youth and individuals
—
2
Brighter Day Recovery Inc
assisting in transforming lives
—
3
Unashamed Inc
We journey with current snd transitioning foster youth, ages 14-26, to overcome shame and know they have value and purpose so they believe they belong in this world.
Youth Development
4
Lifeworks Sc
Restore Families, Rebuild Communities. Reduce Poverty. We can accomplish this through education and career guidance, financial literacy and human rights awareness and advocacy.
Crime & Legal
5
Open Doors of Asheville Inc
OpenDoors of Ashevilles mission is to strengthen community by eliminating the race-based opportunity and achievement gaps for students through education.
Education
6
Bridging Initiatives International
Providing families and individuals experiencing homelessness, with shelter services and rental assistance.
Human Services
7
Life Bridge Inc
Life Bridge facilitates one-to-one mentoring relationships between students Grades 5 to 12 and trained adults in New Hampshire.
Education
8
Open Door Counseling Center
Open Door Counseling Center is a HUD Certified Comprehensive Housing Counseling Agency to educate and assist underserved households to obtain and retain affordable permanent housing; provide immediate basic human needs for community…
—
9
Foster Village Charlotte
Foster Village Charlotte creates connection with dignity for children and families experiencing foster care by meeting urgent needs, providing educational and emotional support, and advocating as a collective community voice for children.
Human Services
10
Friendship House of
To provide programs and services designed to empower youth and families.
Religion
11
House of Hope of Nc Inc
Home, Counseling & Support for Hurting Teens
Education
12
African Cultural Services Inc
The mission of African Cultural Services Inc is to use a holistic approach to lift African immigrant youth and their families to succeed in life through provision of a safe space, educational and mental health support, visual and…
International
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom Communities and the most unlike its peers is A Brighter Day Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$210,000Human Services$152,000Community Improvement$65,000Health$25,000Other$14,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Academy of Goal Achievers ↗
- Who funds Healing Vine Harbor ↗
- Who funds ourBRIDGE for KIDS ↗
- Who funds Gracious Hands Trsnl Housing ↗
- Who funds SHARE Charlotte ↗
- Who funds Freedom Communities ↗
- Who funds Playing for Others ↗
- Who funds The FACTS Initiative ↗
- Who funds Artplus ↗
- Who funds Project 70Forward ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way of Greater Charlotte IncNC20.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Reemprise Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Healing Vine Harbor.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 15.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 462512680 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Healing Vine Harbor, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 30% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Reemprise Fund?
Find your warmest path to Reemprise Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines