· Private foundation
Redman Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $530k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES IN THE US | $50,000 |
| NEW HORIZONS - MOZAMBIQUE | $32,000 |
| BLUE SKY BRIDGE | $30,000 |
| SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION | $30,000 |
| NEW HORIZONS - COLOMBIA | $28,000 |
| GREAT SHAPE INC | $20,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES FISHES | $20,000 |
| THEATRE 4 YOUNG PEOPLE | $20,000 |
| INVEST IN KIDS | $20,000 |
| SUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME | $20,000 |
| BOYSVILLE | $20,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO | $20,000 |
| TEXAS ORGANIC RESOURCE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ROY MAAS YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC | $15,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $474k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +33%
- GQGot Questions Ministries9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +118%
- CACHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM8× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- CWCHRYSALIS WOMENS TRANSITIONALgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +366%
- LILOVE INCone grant, 2019 · $19k
- IFINSIGHT FOR LIVINGone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.
Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
We aim to assist hurting women that demonstrate the desire for a life change with a helping hand up, not a hand out, through a biblically-based, Christ-centered, mentoring and discipleship program. In order to facilitate life-long change,…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.
Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is THEATRE4YOUNGPEOPLEORGINC. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Got Questions Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Project MEND ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds LUMIN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEN OF VALOR ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIA ANTONIA ALONSO CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INVEST IN KIDS ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CHOSEN 300 MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Commonwealth Youthchoirs Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSANNA ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR FREEDOM RESTORATION AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS STORYBOOK PROJECT OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds TEXAS DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THEATRE4YOUNGPEOPLEORGINC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER FOOD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC OF THE TREASURE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds LIVE LOVE NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds TRUE VINEYARD MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Redman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Redman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Redman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.