Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Real World Scholars Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$745kHuman Services$38kYouth Development$37kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kAnimals$10kScience & Tech$9kCommunity Improvement$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,700
Median grant
6
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALDWIN HIGH SCHOOL$10,001
KEYSTONE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL$7,759
OTTO-ELDRED JS HS$3,775
EL CAMINO HIGH SCHOOL$3,489
MONTEITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$3,300
RIVERVIEW JR SR HS$3,126
RAMSAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,308
SOUTH PARK HIGH SCHOOL$2,150
IU1 - EDUCATIONAL CAMPUS WAYNESBURG$2,057
CENTRAL COAST NEW TECH HIGH SCHOOL$2,048
CHARTIERS VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL$2,041
OTHER CHARITABLE DONATION EXPENSE$1,700
Individual grant recipient$1,611
BELLWOOD ANTIS MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,484
BLOSSOM VALLEY ELEMENTARY$1,478
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 8%SYNERGY SERVICES: $150 → 8%LEAST OF THESE: $500 → 8%LILBURN COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC: $600 → 9%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $400 → 21%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION: $7k → 5%LEAST OF THESE: $200 → 8%BUDDY'S SECOND CHANCE RESCUE: $180 → 13%DOGGIE DOES GOOD INC: $130 → 12%ABUSED WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $300 → 10%MAKE A WISH MISSOURI: $301 → 11%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI: $100 → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $575 → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $180 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Real World Scholars Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Real World Scholars Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$798k · 145 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

145 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 122 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

145
239

Total granted

$798k
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+26%

Still filing today

14%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HIGH TECH HIGH
    2× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +85%
  • EF
    Elizabeth Forward Marching Band Boosters
    3× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +40%
  • LS
    LaSalle Springs Middle School PTO1369
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MC
    METCALFE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

6
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
7
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
8
Annie Wright Schools

Annie wright's strong community cultivates individual learners to become well-educated, creative and responsible citizens for a global society.

9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education
11
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
12
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas and the most unlike its peers is Ilead Spring Meadows. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterAddiction Recovery ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Mentoring ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/112
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 386 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/100
Grantees still filing
74/100
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KEYSTONE OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL — $36,584 · OtherHIGH TECH HIGH NC — $30,348 · OtherBALDWIN HIGH SCHOOL — $30,042 · Other+176 more — $776,847 · Other+176 moreHIGH TECH HIGH — $29,326 · EducationElizabeth Forward Marching Band Boosters — $11,157 · EducationBLOSSOM VALLEY PTO — $7,547 · EducationLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $4,942 · EducationIVY ACADEMY INC — $4,232 · EducationWORKSHOP LEARNING — $2,948 · EducationURBAN DISCOVERY SCHOOLS — $2,400 · Education+8 more — $9,324 · EducationSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesHumane Society of Memphis & Shelby County — $1,368 · AnimalsALL ABOUT ANIMALS RESCUE — $1,350 · AnimalsBeans Cafe Inc — $1,342 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$873,821Education$71,876Human Services$7,000Animals$2,718Housing & Shelter$1,342International$1,000Health$1,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHIGH TECH HIGH — $29,326 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLaSalle Springs Middle School PTO1369 — $7,977 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBLOSSOM VALLEY PTO — $7,547 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH OCEANSIDE ELEMENTARY PTO — $6,204 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $4,942 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIVY ACADEMY INC — $4,232 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetILEAD SPRING MEADOWS — $3,236 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORKSHOP LEARNING — $2,948 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN DISCOVERY SCHOOLS — $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ACADEMY OF OHIO — $1,742 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAHAM PRIMARY SCHOOL — $1,539 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS MIDDLE SCHOOL INC — $1,422 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Memphis & Shelby County — $1,368 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL ABOUT ANIMALS RESCUE — $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc — $1,342 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSSEX SCHOOL INC — $1,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINWOOD ACADEMY FOR LEADERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGH TECH HIGH
  • Who funds Elizabeth Forward Marching Band Boosters
  • Who funds LaSalle Springs Middle School PTO1369
  • Who funds BLOSSOM VALLEY PTO
  • Who funds STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOUTH OCEANSIDE ELEMENTARY PTO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Grable FoundationPA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · The Intuit Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Real World Scholars Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America22% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Real World Scholars Inc?

Find your warmest path to Real World Scholars Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 386 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph