Skip to content
R&R Partners Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

R&R Partners Foundation Inc

The r&r partners foundation is dedicated to transforming lives and strengthening the communities in which we live and do business.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$391kEducation$96kPhilanthropy$58kEmployment$13kHuman Services$10kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $58,879, the rows itemized in this filing. The $118,952 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,073 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$14,900
Median grant
2
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEEP MEMORY ALIVE$30,225
CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$14,900
OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION$8,550
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN AREA$5,204
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRYSALIS SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $5k → 11%CHRYSALIS SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$521k · 6 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$521k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+36%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyEmploymentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +82%
  • OV
    OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $13k · revenue +16%
  • NB
    NEVADA BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • UF
    UMC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -10%
  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +182%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation

The University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that raises and manages private funds for the benefit of UNLV. Our mission is to increase philanthropic support for the university, grow its endowment for…

Education
2
Community Foundation of Northern Nevada

To strengthen our community through philanthropy and leadership by connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
3
Unlv Research Foundation

The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…

Science & Tech
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Nevada Community Foundation Inc

Our mission is to steward our donors' charitable giving, now and for generations to come and to provide leadership, vision and impactful community investment for southern nevada.

Philanthropy
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
University of Nevada Alumni Association

The Nevada Alumni Association is here to foster and cultivate a common bond of pride, affinity and connection among alumni, students, prospective students and friends of the University of Nevada, Reno through quality programs, services and…

—
8
Wynn Resorts Foundation

The Wynn Resorts Foundation raises funds from employees and community members to foster volunteerism giving back where it helps most - home.

Philanthropy
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Carson Valley Health Foundation

None

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $381,225 · OtherKEEP MEMORY ALIVECLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $73,540 · OtherCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $30,550 · PhilanthropyOPPORTUNITY…MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMGM RESORTS…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $7,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …NEVADA BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION: $12,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $5,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $13,000 · EmploymentRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $5,204 · HealthUMC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $10,189 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,075 · International
Other$454,765Philanthropy$58,050Education$22,250Employment$13,000Health$10,204Human Services$10,189International$10,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $73,540 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $30,550 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION: $12,250 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $10,189 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $5,204 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUMC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vegas Golden Knights …Nevada Community Foun…Mgm Resorts FoundationNV Energy Charitable …Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vegas Golden Knights Foundation IncNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R&R Partners Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R&R Partners Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on R&R Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home