· Public charity
R&R Partners Foundation Inc
The r&r partners foundation is dedicated to transforming lives and strengthening the communities in which we live and do business.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $58,879 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $118,952 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,073 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEEP MEMORY ALIVE | $30,225 |
| CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $14,900 |
| OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION | $8,550 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN AREA | $5,204 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OVOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +82%
- OVOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE2× · 2018–2019 · $13k · revenue +16%
- NBNEVADA BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +156%
Funded once
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +36%
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +182%- UOUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that raises and manages private funds for the benefit of UNLV. Our mission is to increase philanthropic support for the university, grow its endowment for…
To strengthen our community through philanthropy and leadership by connecting people who care with causes that matter.
The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
Our mission is to steward our donors' charitable giving, now and for generations to come and to provide leadership, vision and impactful community investment for southern nevada.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The Nevada Alumni Association is here to foster and cultivate a common bond of pride, affinity and connection among alumni, students, prospective students and friends of the University of Nevada, Reno through quality programs, services and…
The Wynn Resorts Foundation raises funds from employees and community members to foster volunteerism giving back where it helps most - home.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds NEVADA BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds UMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R&R Partners Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.