Skip to content
Providence Saint John's Health Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Providence Saint John's Health Center

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$601k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$5.0MHealth$2.7MPhilanthropy$1.8MHousing & Shelter$1.3MHuman Services$754kReligion$350kEducation$325kCommunity Improvement$218kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $475k
$27,244
Median grant
6
States reached
$523M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVID & GOLIATH LLC$199,750
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$175,000
SAINT ANNE SCHOOL$50,000
WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
HEALTHSTREAM INC$33,300
HEADSPACE INC$27,244
ROCKET FARM$18,050
THE SHIPYARD LLC$18,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS$14,400
MIGHTY WELL$9,840
ACCUVEIN$5,272
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $530k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $150k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $150k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN - OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY: $150k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN - OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY: $150k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $26k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $150k → 14%CLARIS HEALTH: $16k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $10k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $150k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $45k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $148k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $35k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
OH
RI
CA
UT
MD
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 10 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$4.3M
$6.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+39%

Still filing today

90%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $376k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERN
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +696%
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +110%
  • WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF SANTA MONICA
    one grant, 2022 · $5.0M
  • NH
    NATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $278k · revenue +60%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
4
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
5
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
6
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
12
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Santa Monica Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
25/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF SANTA MONICA: $5,000,000 · OtherCITY OF SANTA MONICASALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $250,000 · Other+23 more: $1,088,412 · Other+23 moreVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,400,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $455,040 · HealthWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH …NATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $278,000 · HealthNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDAT…PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $178,612 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDA…WISE AND HEALTHY AGING: $170,971 · HealthWISE AND HEALTHY AGING+4 more: $170,225 · Health+4 moreENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,750,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT I…THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,429,557 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONC…ST JOSEPH CENTER: $183,418 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTE…+4 more: $107,000 · Human Services+4 morePALISADES WILL ROGERS 5 & 10 K RUN FOUNDATION: $216,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $117,520 · Community ImprovementTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $70,650 · Education
Other$6,338,412Health$2,652,848Philanthropy$1,750,000Human Services$1,719,975Public Safety & Disaster$216,500Community Improvement$117,520Education$70,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,750,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,429,557 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,400,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $455,040 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $278,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPALISADES WILL ROGERS 5 & 10 K RUN FOUNDATION: $216,500 over 6y, 66% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $183,418 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $178,612 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING: $170,971 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $117,520 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFASHION FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION OF NY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetBEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $70,650 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $55,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSt Anne School: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLinden Oaks: $39,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN WAYNE CANCER INSTITUTE AUXILIARY: $31,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetASSOCIATES FOR BREAST & PROSTATE CANCER STUDIES: $24,750 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN NURSES CREDENTIALING CENTER: $22,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITECARE OF WASHINGTON: $21,475 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCLARIS HEALTH: $16,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUPWARD BOUND HOUSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS TORO AUXILIARY PARTNERS: $14,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA MONICA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …QueensCareThe Ralph M Parsons F…Unihealth FoundationCedars-Sinai Medical …The Ahmanson Foundati…Weingart FoundationSanta Monica Rotary C…Kiwanis Charities of …The Stanley & Joyce B…The Rose Hills Founda…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
California Community FoundationCA29.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · QueensCare · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Unihealth Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Santa Monica Rotary Club Foundation · Kiwanis Charities of Santa Monica Inc · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Providence Saint John's Health Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Providence Saint John's Health Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Providence Saint John's Health Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home