Skip to content
Power Ministry at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Power Ministry

To provide christian fellowship and help others in need.

$171k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$691kInternational$329kFood & Nutrition$230kHuman Services$157kEducation$111kYouth Development$87kArts & Culture$41kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $98,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $170,561 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,161 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
$7,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$861k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES$47,300
BORDER MISSIONS$12,200
WHITESTONE MINISTRIES$11,500
CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL$7,200
BIG HEART ORPHANAGE$7,200
FAITH MISSION INTERNATIONAL$7,000
TURN$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TURN: $11k → 14%KIDCARE INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%VAPOR MINISTRIES: $10k → 18%TURN: $7k → 14%TURN: $6k → 14%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $31k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTL: $5k → 27%CHILDREN'S HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
OR
WY
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Power Ministry’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Power Ministrylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 25 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
25

Total granted

$1.6M
$301k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+14%

Still filing today

52%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    IBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $199k · revenue +9%
  • RC
    RICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES
    6× · 2017–2026 · $136k · revenue +552%
  • CH
    Childrens Haven International
    9× · 2017–2026 · $114k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • M
    MADRIGAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $41k
  • AM
    AFRICA MERCY PARTNERS
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +14%
  • HO
    HANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
2
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
3
Mexico Orphan Missions Inc
International
4
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
5
Christian Ministries International
—
6
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
7
Touch the World Ministries Inc

To seek to proclaim the name of Jesus Christ, to promote Christian principles and the spiritual and physical well being of the world. Major programs include: Orphan ministries, including building orphanages, feeding and educating children,…

Religion
8
La Fuente Ministries Heart 4 Mexico

Church planting, missions training, full-time missionary support, Children's ministry and Mercy Ministry to the poor in Mexico, running of home for abandoned girls called Nana's House

Religion
9
Hands of Mercy International

To build individual houses for needy families in Mexico and direct them to Mexican pastors to further the gospel of Jesus Christ.

International
10
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
11
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
12
Yucatan Outreach Ministries

Starting and maintaining missions/churches in Mexico

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Heart Ministries; the most unlike its peers is New Covenant Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIES: $198,500 · OtherIBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIESFAITH MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $154,744 · OtherFAITH MISSION INTERNATIONALNew Covenant Farms Inc: $140,942 · OtherNew Covenant Farms IncALIANZA CHRISTINA DEL VALLE: $101,340 · OtherALIANZA CHRISTINA DEL VALLEMAGDIEL BIBLE SCHOOL-BUILDING PROJECT: $62,366 · OtherALIANZA CRISTINA CHURCH: $57,947 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $49,350 · OtherPAMALA MORELOCK-MAGDIEL BIBLE SCHOOL: $48,800 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $45,900 · Other+22 more: $371,520 · Other+22 moreRICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES: $136,439 · InternationalRICK CAYWOOD…AFRICA MERCY PARTNERS: $21,000 · InternationalAFRICA MERCY…HANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC: $20,000 · InternationalHANDS OF LOV…EMPOWERING UGANDANS: $10,700 · InternationalBRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE: $7,500 · International+2 more: $11,500 · International+2 moreBIG HEART MINISTRIES: $67,550 · ReligionBIG HEART M…KALEO INTERNATIONAL INC: $46,650 · ReligionKALEO INTER…BORDER MISSIONS: $39,600 · ReligionBORDER MISS…Elam Ministries: $31,500 · ReligionElam Minist…RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $8,350 · ReligionChildrens Haven International: $113,980 · Human ServicesChildrens…TODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesTODAYS UR…Vapor Ministries Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesVapor Min…KidCare International: $10,000 · Human ServicesKidCare I…Remember NHU Inc: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentAFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC: $30,450 · EducationThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $7,500 · PhilanthropyRebirth Homes Inc: $5,000 · Health
Other$1,231,409International$207,139Religion$193,650Human Services$157,980Youth Development$40,000Education$30,450Philanthropy$7,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIES: $198,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetNew Covenant Farms Inc: $140,942 over 4y, 100% of budgetRICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES: $136,439 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetChildrens Haven International: $113,980 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetBIG HEART MINISTRIES: $67,550 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetKALEO INTERNATIONAL INC: $46,650 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetRemember NHU Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBORDER MISSIONS: $39,600 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetElam Ministries: $31,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC: $30,450 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC: $24,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetWHITE STONE MINISTRIES INC: $23,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAFRICA MERCY PARTNERS: $21,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEMPOWERING UGANDANS: $10,700 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetVapor Ministries Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKidCare International: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $8,350 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHT VISION ORPHAN CARE: $7,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEXICO MISSIONS INC: $5,150 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRebirth Homes Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION TWENTY-FIVE 35: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IBEROAMERICAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds New Covenant Farms Inc ↗
  • Who funds RICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Haven International ↗
  • Who funds BIG HEART MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KALEO INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Remember NHU Inc ↗
  • Who funds BORDER MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC ↗
  • Who funds TODAYS URBAN RENEWAL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE STONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA MERCY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERING UGANDANS ↗
  • Who funds Vapor Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds KidCare International ↗
  • Who funds RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mike and Linda Van Da…Servant FoundationChristian Community F…Thrivent Charitable I…Natl Christian Charit…The Ayco Charitable F…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…
Mike and Linda Van Daele Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mike and Linda Van Daele Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Power Ministry funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Power Ministry. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Power Ministry?

    Find your warmest path to Power Ministry through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Power Ministry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home