Skip to content
Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy at a glance

· Public charity

Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy

Chronic illness assistance dedicated to generating funds for charitable orgs that assist individuals in managing their care of chronic diseases and that do research to find cures for chronic diseases; assist individuals and their families with managing their medical care.

$519k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MInternational$48kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $495,512, the rows itemized in this filing. The $518,927 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,415 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $417k
$31,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$140,000
AMERICAN THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTAIS NETWORK$100,000
INDIANA HEMOPHILIA AND THROMBOSIS CENTER$100,000
THE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE$77,000
THE COALITION FOR HEMOPHILIA B$31,500
FWGBD$25,000
SAVE ONE LIFE INC$10,000
HFA HELPING HANDS$6,595
NBDF SOIREE$5,417
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LONESTAR CHAPTER OF NHF: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 9 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+54%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +49%
  • TH
    THE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +16%
  • TH
    The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization
    2× · 2022–2024 · $185k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • WF
    WORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue +60%
  • LS
    LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • CA
    COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cascade Hemophilia Consortium
Health
2
Asociacion Puertorriquena De Hemofilia Inc

Guarantee the rights of patients and people with a diagnosis of hemophilia and bleeding conditions

Health
3
Hemophilia Foundation of Greater Florida Inc

Hemophilia foundation of greater florida is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with related bleeding disorders and their families through education, information and referral services, advocacy and research.

Health
4
Hemophilia of Georgia Inc

Hemophilia of georgia exists so that people in georgia affected by bleeding disorders live as normally and productively as possible.

Health
5
Hemophilia Foundation of Md Inc

To provide services to hemophilia patients nad their families in the state of Maryland

Philanthropy
6
Hemophilia of Indiana Inc

The organization is dedicated to the treatment and cure of hemophilia and related bleeding disorders through support of research, education, and service.

—
7
Bleeding Disorders Foundation of North Carolina

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of persons affected by bleeding disorders through advocacy, education, promotion of research and delivery of supportive programs and services.

Human Services
8
The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington

The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington mission: The BDFW serves and educates the bleeding disorder community and advocates for access to care for those with rare diseases.

—
9
Hemophilia Foundation of Southern California

HFSCs mission is to improve the quality of life and build community for families and individuals living with hemophilia or other bleeding disorders, by offering a variety of programs and services that educate, advocate and support the…

—
10
The Hemophilia Assoc of San Diego County

The association was founded to provide programs for individuals with hemophilia.

—
11
Bleeding Disorders Council of California formerly Hemophilia Council of Calif

The mission of hcc is to improve access to care and treatment options in order to advance the quality of life for people with bleeding disorders through advocacy, education, and outreach in the collaboration with its founding member…

Health
12
Western New York Bloodcare Inc

Western new york bloodcare, inc. provides specialized diagnostic and health maintenance services to individuals with hemophilia and other genetic bleeding and clotting disorders that require lifelong medical management. for people affected…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Bleeding Disorders Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Coalition for Hemophilia B Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $700,000 · HealthAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INCINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INC: $300,000 · HealthINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INCTHE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $285,000 · HealthTHE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATIONThe Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization: $185,000 · HealthThe Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing OrganizationThe Coalition for Hemophilia B Inc: $77,010 · HealthFoundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders: $75,000 · Health+3 more: $80,595 · HealthNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $30,417 · OtherCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherLONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $5,150 · Human Services
Health$1,702,605Other$40,417Human Services$20,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $700,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetINDIANA HEMOPHILIA & THROMBOSIS CENTER INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEMOPHILIA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $285,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetThe Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization: $185,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Coalition for Hemophilia B Inc: $77,010 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFoundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders: $75,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSAVE ONE LIFE INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USA: $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $30,417 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEMOPHILIA FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $12,595 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Allian…The Hemophilia Allian…Hemophilia of Georgia…Colburn-Keenan Founda…National Bleeding Dis…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing OrganizationFL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization · The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · Hemophilia of Georgia Inc · Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc · National Bleeding Disorders Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy?

    Find your warmest path to Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Positudes Inc Dba the Alliance Pharmacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home