Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Plus Foundation

The PLUS FOUNDATION supports tomorrow's diverse professional liability workforce through outreach, education, mentoring and giving back.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$250kEmployment$183kHealth$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCommunity Improvement$30kPhilanthropy$28kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $31,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $56,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$31,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE ORLANDO$31,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ZERO8HUNDRED: $68k → 11%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $6k → 9%CLEARBROOK: $6k → 14%BE A SHERO FOUNDATION: $33k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NV
CA
VA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
2
Northeast Florida Womens Veterans Inc

Women veterans ignited, inc. is focused on ensuring women who have served on active duty, national guard or reserves transition into the civilian community with the tools they need to become self-sufficient. we will provide supportive…

Community Improvement
3
Dress for Success Houston

The mission of dress for success houston is to promote the economic independence of women by providing professional attire, a network of support and career development tools to help women thrive in work and in life.

Human Services
4
Dress for Success Oregon

Empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and tools to help them thrive in work and in life

Human Services
5
Win Together Inc

WIN Together's purpose is to empower women from underserved communities by providing workshops and community specific programming that offers training in negotiation, advocacy and other skills needed for personal and professional success.…

—
6
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
7
Dress for Success Charlotte

A womens advancement center, the mission of Dress for Success is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools to thrive in work and in life. Programs and…

Human Services
8
United Way of Charlotte County Inc

Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.

Philanthropy
9
Dress for Success Oklahoma City Inc

The mission of Dress for Success Oklahoma City is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and the development tools to help women thrive in work and life.

Human Services
10
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
11
Operation Homefront Inc

Build strong, stable, and secure military families so they can thrive - not simply struggle to get by - in the communities they've worked so hard to protect.

Community Improvement
12
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Be a Shero Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kidpower Teenpower Fullpower International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC — $73,500 · OtherUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE…ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA — $58,859 · OtherARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USAAttitudes & Attire — $58,256 · OtherAttitudes & AttireUNITED WAY OF FLORIDA INC — $25,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF FLORIDA INC+4 more — $22,000 · Other+4 moreZero8Hundred Inc — $67,900 · Human ServicesZero8Hundred IncBE A SHERO FOUNDATION — $32,850 · Human ServicesBE A SHERO FOUNDATI…CLEARBROOK — $6,000 · Human ServicesKIDVANTAGE — $6,000 · Human ServicesLEKOTEK OF GEORGIA INC — $57,363 · HealthLEKOTEK OF GEORG…Friends of Fisher House Orlando Inc — $31,000 · HealthFriends of Fishe…CHRISTMAS WITHOUT CANCER NFP — $6,000 · HealthCHRISTMAS WITHOU…Ronald McDonald House Global — $5,000 · HealthHIRE HEROES USA INC — $62,575 · EducationHIRE HEROES …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILL…DRESS FOR SUCCESS SOUTHERN NEVADA — $32,640 · EmploymentDRESS FOR …WOMEN EMPLOYED — $29,552 · EmploymentWOMEN EMPL…INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $27,600 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $25,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL WOMEN VETERANS UNITED — $29,551 · Community Improvement
Other$237,615Human Services$112,750Health$99,363Education$72,575Employment$62,192Philanthropy$52,600Community Improvement$29,551

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC — $73,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetZero8Hundred Inc — $67,900 over 1y, 11% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC — $62,575 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAttitudes & Attire — $58,256 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetLEKOTEK OF GEORGIA INC — $57,363 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetBE A SHERO FOUNDATION — $32,850 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS SOUTHERN NEVADA — $32,640 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED — $29,552 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN VETERANS UNITED — $29,551 over 1y, 22% of budgetINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $27,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF FLORIDA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS WITHOUT CANCER NFP — $6,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAtlantic Street Center — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDVANTAGE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Plus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines