· Private foundation
Phyllis & Donald Kahn Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k58 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $36,000 |
| SCHUBERT CLUB | $5,000 |
| THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP | $2,000 |
| THE SOCIETY FOR CREATIVE ANACHRONISM | $500 |
| COUSTEAU SOCIETY | $500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SMITHSONIAN | $500 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $500 |
| CONSUMER REPORTS | $500 |
| WORLD WITHOUT GENOCIDE - WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE | $500 |
| PARKS AND TRAILS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA | $500 |
| RUTGERS FOUNDATION | $500 |
| SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION | $500 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $500 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $500 |
| THE ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2022, 48 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2022 · $36k · revenue +105%
- PEPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +69%
- SCSCHUBERT CLUB THE3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +118%
Funded once
- IFINSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS- UNIV OF MINNone grant, 2017 · $5k
- ARANIMAL RESCUE TEACHING FOR ANY LEVEL OF LEARNERone grant, 2020 · $4k
- NFNEIGHBORS FOR EAST BANK LIVABILITYone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.
Catalyze collaboration across perspectives, power, and systems for social equity and environmental health.
To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.
The alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations and advocacy groups with a mission to build power across the intersections of geography, race, culture, and issues in the twin cities region to eliminate systems of oppression…
The minnesota environmental partnership is a coalition that strengthens member effectiveness and builds collective power to secure a healthy environment for all minnesotans.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
To support charitable, plant-based scientific, and educational activities exclusively for the benefit of the minnesota landscape arboretum of the university of minnesota
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts Dba Minneapolis Institute of Arts and the most unlike its peers is Juvenile Justice Advocates International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHUBERT CLUB THE ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS IN DEBUT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FORWARD GLOBAL WOMEN ↗
- Who funds League of American Wheelman Inc ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds The Arts Partnership ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS FOR EAST BANK LIVABILITY ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN BOATBUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
- Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds WOMN ACT ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ↗
- Who funds Southeast Seniors A living at homeblock nurse program ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds PARKS & TRAILS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · The K Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phyllis & Donald Kahn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Phyllis & Donald Kahn Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Phyllis & Donald Kahn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.