Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Philip M Waterman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$75kReligion$54kCivil Rights$30kArts & Culture$23kEducation$16kHealth$10kEnvironment$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION$15,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER$9,780
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$5,000
METRO MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$2,500
NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE & ART$600
RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL$500
THE DALTON SCHOOL$500
THE FRICK COLLECTION$150
SOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE JEWISH BOARD: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$193k · 21 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$193k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+21%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +112%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +111%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • TE
    TEMPLE EMORY EL STREICKER
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • SL
    ST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +45%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
4
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
6
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
7
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
8
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
9
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
12
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection and the most unlike its peers is Marsh Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish International Suppor…Union Membership Benefit Or…Homeless Services & Food As…Cancer Research FundingYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Education & Developme…Hospital Systems and Health…Performing Arts Venues & Ac…Nyc Community Development O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr21%25%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr14%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%0%10–20yr21%7%20–35yr13%63%35–55yr14%29%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
11%
2,814/26,725

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER — $28,945 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTERCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF NY — $16,925 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF NYPROJECT MORRY — $5,500 · OtherPROJECT MORRYMETRO MUSEUM OF ART — $4,000 · OtherTHE TOWN SCHOOL INC — $4,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMORY EL STREICKER — $3,600 · Other+21 more — $14,835 · Other+21 moreCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $500 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $30,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $4,500 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $3,720 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $3,270 · Arts & CultureST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History — $740 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $351 · Arts & CultureDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $3,500 · EducationTHE SPENCE SCHOOL — $2,000 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $2,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC — $600 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$77,805Recreation & Sports$75,500Civil Rights$30,000Arts & Culture$15,081Education$9,850Philanthropy$5,500Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOWN SCHOOL INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $3,720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $3,270 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD HILLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $740 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON ROSE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budget1898 FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarsh Sanctuary Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ILLUSTRATORS INC — $211 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philip M Waterman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph