Skip to content

· Private foundation

Phicas Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$430kEducation$283kHealth$78kArts & Culture$60kCivil Rights$50kFood & Nutrition$24kHousing & Shelter$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $93k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$33,000
CHARLESTON WATERKEEPERS$25,000
COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE$25,000
KENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL$10,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$7,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$7,500
DEACON CLUB WFU$7,500
LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST$7,500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$3,000
NATIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ARM IN ARMEVERY TOWN$2,500
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $1k → 12%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $500 → 12%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $500 → 12%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $500 → 12%CHARLESTON AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $3k → 12%CHARLESTON AREA URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$986k · 46 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
14

Total granted

$986k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+310%

Still filing today

52%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $162k · revenue +30%
  • LL
    LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +125%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • GF
    GROW FOOD CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CO
    CHRIST OUR KING STELLA MARIS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
2
South Carolina Environmental Law Project Inc

We use our legal expertise to protect the land, water and communities across south carolina.

Environment
3
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc

We advocates to protect the natural environment of South Carolinas coast for the benefit of all. We envision a South Carolina coast where wildlife thrives, air and water are clean, and natural

Environment
4
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
5
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Triangle Land Conservancy Inc

Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…

Environment
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
12
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Club Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pure Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLESTON WATERKEEPERS: $145,000 · OtherCHARLESTON WATERKEEPERSCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE: $128,500 · OtherCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUEKENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL: $70,000 · OtherKENAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOLDEACON CLUB WFU: $40,350 · OtherDEACON CLUB WFUSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $33,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $33,500 · Other+42 more: $284,502 · Other+42 moreWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $162,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERS…BOOKS FOR KEEPS INC: $20,000 · EducationBOOKS FOR KEEPS INC+1 more: $1,000 · EducationLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $38,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentBeautiful Places Alliance: $5,000 · EnvironmentGreen Heart Project Inc: $4,500 · Environment+1 more: $250 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $12,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $6,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,500 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,500 · ReligionKIDS ON POINT INC: $12,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$735,352Education$183,000Environment$53,250Health$24,000Crime & Legal$20,000Religion$12,500Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $162,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $38,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR KEEPS INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE TOWN UNITED INC: $17,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEmergencyRV Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $7,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARM IN ARM: $6,250 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeautiful Places Alliance: $5,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetPure Theatre: $4,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Heart Project Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRIDENT URBAN LEAGUE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOTLIGHT PLAYERS INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHAS COUNTY LIBRARY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR KEEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE TOWN UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EmergencyRV Inc ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ARM IN ARM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Beautiful Places Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Pure Theatre ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Green Heart Project Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Joanna Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Pathfinder Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Phicas Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Phicas Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Phicas Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Phicas Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Phicas’ filings →

More from the funding graph