How much did HENRY & SYLVIA YASCHIK FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of HENRY & SYLVIA YASCHIK FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

baptistbethkidsartmuseumconservationsynagogue emanu-el

2019

landchasspoletocemeteryfestivalmuseumhistoric

2020

fkahopeholycongregationclinicartmuseum

2021

cancercharleston parkscemeteryconservationpartnershistoricfestival

2022

hearthopegreater charlestoncemeteryfestivalhistorictrident

2023

productionchildrenhomelessnessstudentsprogrammingnamingresidential

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k68 grants · $220k
$10k–50k26 grants · $475k
$50k–250k3 grants · $151k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SC$50,500
JEWISH STUDIES CENTER INC$50,000
MUSC HOWARD B SHERMAN FUND$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHAS$35,000
SOUTHEASTERN WILDLIFE EXPOSITION$30,000
CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE-CHABAD OF CHAS$25,000
DORCHESTER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
HALOS$25,000
MUSC FOUNDATION$25,000
CHARLESTON JEWISH FEDERATION$25,000
CHARLESTON STAGE$25,000
BROOKGREEN GARDENS$20,000
PORTER-GAUD$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF SC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$20,000
SHERMAN HOUSE$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.9M · 148 repeat orgs$640k to everyone else

148 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

148

Total granted

$5.9M

$499k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+42%

Still filing today

45%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JS
JEWISH STUDIES CENTER INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +34% · 41% of their budget
SW
SOUTHEASTERN WILDLIFE EXPOSITION
6× · 2019–2024 · $205k · revenue +106%
AC
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS
6× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +54%

Funded once

MC
MUSC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
one grant, 2023 · $25k
JH
JCC HOUSING CORPORATION
one grant, 2018 · $25k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
one grant, 2018 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Charleston Waterkeeper

Charleston waterkeeper's mission it to protect and restore charleston's waterways for our community and future generations. we do that through an effective mix of boots-on-the-water stewardship and data-driven advocacy designed to protect…

Environment

College of Charleston Foundation

To promote education, research, and development programs for the exclusive benefit of the college of charleston

Education

Sc Chamber of Commerce

Be the leading voice for business in south carolina.

—

South Carolina Public Interest

Crime & Legal

Charleston Metro Chamber of Commerce

To initiate, advocate, and empower our region to advance a prosperous business environment.

—

South Carolina Council On

Providing actionable research, supporting industry clusters, and furthering education and workforce development.

Community Improvement

Carolina Art Association

The mission of the gibbes museum of art is to enhance lives through art by engaging people of every background and experience with art and artists of enduring quality; collect and preserve the art that touches charleston; and provide…

Arts & Culture

Charleston Redevelopment

To facilitate, develop, and advocate for neighborhood revitalization, affordable housing construction, preservation and economic development in charleston county

Community Improvement

South Carolina Christian Chamber of

To unify christians in south carolina by connecting commerce and community to positively impact our culture for christ.

Religion

Charleston Good Inc

Our mission is to develop support and promote nonprofit and grassroots people projects organizations and collaborations in the Lowcountry.

Arts & Culture

College of Charleston Alumni Association

The purpose of the association shall be to manifest an interest in, and to promote the welfare of, the college of charleston and its graduate affiliate, the university of charleston, s.c.; hereinafter referred to as the college of…

Education

Jewish Endowment Foundation of South

The jewish endowment foundation of south carolina supports jewish and other charitable causes primarily in the charleston community.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Charleston Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Roper St Francis Healthcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/116

the rest of the field

13%

296/2,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

106 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

102/106

Grantees still filing

77/106

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,739,691Community Improvement$489,000Arts & Culture$269,250Environment$261,000Human Services$258,500Health$242,000Education$240,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of SouthSC122.7× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South · The Joanna Foundation · Post & Courier Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Trident United Way · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · Employees Community Fund · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Daniel Island Community Fund Inc · Medical Society of South Carolina · Kuznik Charitable Foundation · Central Carolina Community

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HENRY & SYLVIA YASCHIK FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JEWISH STUDIES CENTER INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 571094139 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JEWISH STUDIES CENTER INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HENRY & SYLVIA YASCHIK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

106 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

HENRY & SYLVIA YASCHIK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

106 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph