Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$309kEducation$229kArts & Culture$169kHealth$151kInternational$103kHuman Services$53kYouth Development$32kEmployment$24kReligion$24kOther$407k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION$36,000
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$25,000
MENTAL HEALTH COALITION INC$15,000
CPR FOUNDATION$10,000
THE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL$10,000
CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL JEWISH PHILANTHROPY INC$10,000
BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$3,600
MACCABI USA$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%Humorology: $500 → 10%Shalva: $4k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$984k · 21 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
56

Total granted

$984k
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+23%

Still filing today

81%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $172k · revenue ×14
  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    6× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue ×13
  • GP
    GULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • MJ
    MEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • MI
    MEOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
5
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
10
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jerusalem Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sallie Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersFallen First Responder Supp…At-Risk Youth MentoringVeteran Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentEducation Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Jewish Community FederationsPublic University Foundatio…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
4/60
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,505

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/55
Grantees still filing
42/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OLAMI — $150,000 · OtherOLAMITHE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL — $50,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIALMEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTER — $50,000 · OtherMEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTERUJA — $21,600 · OtherOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · OtherTHE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC — $23,600 · OtherMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $20,000 · Other+39 more — $145,280 · Other+39 moreCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION — $172,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATI…GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $97,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FE…Mental Health Coalition Inc — $15,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $25,300 · Philanthropy+5 moreGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $105,000 · EducationGULLIVER PREPARAT…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WIS…University of Miami — $41,800 · EducationUniversity of Mia…MEOR INC — $25,000 · EducationMEOR INC+4 more — $7,500 · EducationBrothers for Life — $163,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for…+3 more — $6,400 · Arts & CultureMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $60,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI…The Curetivity Foundation — $30,000 · HealthThe Curetiv…BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $26,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE …BREAKTHROUGH T1D — $13,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUG…HOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND — $7,500 · Health+6 more — $14,300 · Health+6 moreCentral Fund of Israel — $78,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 · InternationalTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $17,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC — $3,600 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human Services
Other$485,480Philanthropy$309,300Education$229,300Arts & Culture$169,400Health$151,300International$103,000Human Services$52,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION — $172,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetBrothers for Life — $163,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $97,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $78,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $41,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation — $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEOR INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC — $23,600 over 3y, 22% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $17,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S VOICES IN ISRAEL — $15,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $7,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDWISH MEDWORKS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHALVA INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PLAY ON FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL IN THE SQUARE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISRAEL PROJECT — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTINGTON FINE ARTS INSTITUTE LTD — $1,800 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAN CAVE HEALTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC FORCE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMOROLOGY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundLisa & Michael Leffel…Julie and Martin Fran…Alan and Giselle Weis…Associated Jewish Cha…Jewish Community Foun…The Rosalie Katz Fami…FjcThe Ayco Charitable F…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Jewish Communal FundNY20.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Lisa & Michael Leffell Foundation · Julie and Martin Franklin Family Foundation Inc · Alan and Giselle Weissman Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Rosalie Katz Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Gulliver Preparatory School Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines