Skip to content
Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$267kArts & Culture$174kPublic Safety & Disaster$173kHealth$157kInternational$127kPhilanthropy$126kHuman Services$79kCommunity Improvement$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION$36,000
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$25,000
MENTAL HEALTH COALITION INC$15,000
CPR FOUNDATION$10,000
THE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL$10,000
CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL JEWISH PHILANTHROPY INC$10,000
BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$3,600
MACCABI USA$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%Humorology: $500 → 10%Shalva: $4k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$984k · 21 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
56

Total granted

$984k
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+20%

Still filing today

81%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $172k · revenue ×14
  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    6× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue ×13
  • GP
    GULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • MJ
    MEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • MI
    MEOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
5
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
10
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jerusalem Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Sallie Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/55
Grantees still filing
41/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLAMI: $150,000 · OtherOLAMITHE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL: $50,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIALMEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTER: $50,000 · OtherMEOR - JEWISH ENRICHMENT CENTERUJA: $21,600 · OtherOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC: $23,600 · OtherMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS: $20,000 · Other+39 more: $145,280 · Other+39 moreCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION: $172,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATI…GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $97,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FE…Mental Health Coalition Inc: $15,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $25,300 · Philanthropy+5 moreGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $105,000 · EducationGULLIVER PREPARAT…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WIS…University of Miami: $41,800 · EducationUniversity of Mia…MEOR INC: $25,000 · EducationMEOR INC+4 more: $7,500 · EducationBrothers for Life: $163,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for…+3 more: $6,400 · Arts & CultureMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI…The Curetivity Foundation: $30,000 · HealthThe Curetiv…BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $26,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE …BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUG…HOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $7,500 · Health+6 more: $14,300 · Health+6 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $78,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $25,000 · InternationalTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $17,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $3,600 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human Services
Other$485,480Philanthropy$309,300Education$229,300Arts & Culture$169,400Health$151,300International$103,000Human Services$52,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS FOUNDATION: $172,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetBrothers for Life: $163,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetGULLIVER PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $97,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $78,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $41,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEOR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC: $23,600 over 3y, 22% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS: $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $17,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S VOICES IN ISRAEL: $15,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $7,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PLAY ON FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE ISRAEL PROJECT: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON FINE ARTS INSTITUTE LTD: $1,800 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL IN THE SQUARE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAN CAVE HEALTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMOROLOGY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC FORCE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundLisa & Michael Leffel…Julie and Martin Fran…Alan and Giselle Weis…Associated Jewish Cha…Jewish Community Foun…The Rosalie Katz Fami…FjcThe Ayco Charitable F…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Jewish Communal FundNY20.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Lisa & Michael Leffell Foundation · Julie and Martin Franklin Family Foundation Inc · Alan and Giselle Weissman Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Rosalie Katz Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Gulliver Preparatory School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Peter & Stacy Hochfelder Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter & Stacy Hochfelder’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home