Skip to content

· Public charity

Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers

The PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS (pachc) is a nonprofit association that supports pennsylvania's community health centers in improving health and access to affordable high-quality care.

$746k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.9MHuman Services$107kReligion$62kYouth Development$48kFood & Nutrition$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $672k
$16,931
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEYSTONE HEALTH CENTER$37,625
AMBULATORY HEALTH SERVICES$35,744
SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION$31,982
UNION COMMUNITY CARE$28,219
HAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC$28,219
MEADVILLE MEDICAL$26,338
BERKS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$26,338
FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING$26,338
CORNERSTONE CARE$26,338
CENTERVILLE CLINICS INC$26,338
PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK$26,338
DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH$24,566
LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA$24,457
WAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH$24,457
PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT$22,575
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $40k → 6%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $17k → 11%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $32k → 6%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $13k → 11%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $30k → 6%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $10k → 11%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $30k → 6%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $9k → 11%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $24k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $6k → 22%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $21k → 6%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $20k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $6k → 22%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $20k → 6%LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA: $10k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $6k → 22%FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING: $29k → 22%FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING: $26k → 22%FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING: $22k → 22%FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING: $20k → 22%FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING: $9k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 54 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
9

Total granted

$5.0M
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+15%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $953k · revenue +194%
  • MM
    MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +48%
  • LH
    LCH Health and Community Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $227k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • OG
    OTHER GRANTS & OTHER ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $264k
  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +20%
  • BH
    Brookville Hospital
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
3
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
4
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
5
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Franklin County Incorporated

The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…

Health
7
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
9
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
10
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
11
Berks Community Health Center

Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.

Health
12
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Health Partners Community Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Meadville Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/59
Grantees still filing
47/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER: $237,353 · HealthMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTERConsumer Health Coalition: $217,370 · HealthConsumer Health CoalitionKEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC: $180,782 · HealthKEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INCESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC: $147,906 · HealthPRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK: $143,690 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH NET: $143,588 · HealthWAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $116,159 · HealthSADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION: $113,717 · HealthHAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC: $105,774 · HealthCORNERSTONE CARE INC: $104,132 · HealthCENTERVILLE CLINICS INC: $103,804 · Health+33 more: $1,370,720 · Health+33 moreHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $953,158 · OtherHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INCOTHER GRANTS & OTHER ASSISTANCE: $264,152 · OtherOTHER GRANTS & OTHER ASSISTANCECITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $135,858 · OtherCITY OF PHILADELPHIADELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $104,735 · OtherDELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INCBERKS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $101,624 · OtherBERKS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERBROAD TOP AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $77,512 · OtherB-K HEALTH CENTER INC: $63,956 · Other+8 more: $187,108 · Other+8 moreLCH Health and Community Services: $227,166 · Human ServicesResources for Human Development Inc: $106,894 · Human ServicesTHREE RIVERS YOUTH: $48,404 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $17,500 · Human ServicesThe Wright Center Medical Group: $61,925 · ReligionCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $22,917 · Food & Nutrition
Health$2,984,995Other$1,888,103Human Services$399,964Religion$61,925Food & Nutrition$22,917

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $953,158 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER: $237,353 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLCH Health and Community Services: $227,166 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetConsumer Health Coalition: $217,370 over 5y, 14% of budgetKEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC: $180,782 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC: $147,906 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK: $143,690 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NET: $143,588 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $116,159 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION: $113,717 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetResources for Human Development Inc: $106,894 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC: $105,774 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $104,735 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE CARE INC: $104,132 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTERVILLE CLINICS INC: $103,804 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $92,337 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $88,890 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $82,303 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPublic Health Management Corporation: $81,184 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $81,104 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBROAD TOP AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $77,512 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $75,017 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLENDALE AREA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $71,640 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCHARLES COLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT: $64,621 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetB-K HEALTH CENTER INC: $63,956 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Wright Center Medical Group: $61,925 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Penn Comprehensive Health Services: $56,771 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER: $55,449 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH & DENTAL CARE INC: $55,112 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $53,782 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULTI-CULTURAL HEALTH EVALUATION DELIVERY SYSTEM INC: $52,815 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $50,783 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE RIVERS YOUTH: $48,404 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPrimary Care Health Services Inc: $43,260 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $43,229 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMETRO FAMILY PRACTICE INC: $42,092 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMON VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNION COMMUNITY CARE: $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHYNDMAN AREA HEALTH CENTER: $29,077 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $22,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrookville Hospital: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $19,644 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SIDE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $18,220 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $16,516 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER VALLEY HEALTH: $15,857 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPenn Highlands Healthcare Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LCH Health and Community Services ↗
  • Who funds Consumer Health Coalition ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NET ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERVILLE CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROAD TOP AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GLENDALE AREA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES COLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds B-K HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
  • Who funds North Penn Comprehensive Health Services ↗
  • Who funds SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH & DENTAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MULTI-CULTURAL HEALTH EVALUATION DELIVERY SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Primary Care Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental Community Care FoundationCA44.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Accessmatters · Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Independence Blue Cross Foundation · Highmark Foundation · Pennsylvania Coalition for Oral Health · Family Health Council of Central Pa Inc · Healthshare Exchange of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph