· Public charity
Accessmatters
ACCESSMATTERS' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $505k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $2.2M
- $250k+8 grants · $6.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA - AMBULATORY HEALTH SERVICES | $2,466,800 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST PA INC | $1,148,063 |
| DREXEL UNIVERSITY - ST CHRISTOPHER HOSPITAL | $800,254 |
| RHDFAMILY PRACTICE & COUNSELING NETWORK | $607,420 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA | $482,254 |
| TEMPLE FACULTY PRACTICE PLAN INC | $349,332 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | $315,880 |
| EDUCATION PLUS HEALTH | $270,985 |
| LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES | $245,593 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE | $244,542 |
| ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER | $196,632 |
| PROJECT HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES | $191,972 |
| PENN MEDICINE BREAST HEALTH INITIATIVE | $162,393 |
| BEBASHI | $160,059 |
| HEALTH PROMOTION COUNCIL | $147,490 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
59 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA9× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +20%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA9× · 2017–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +88%
- TFTemple Faculty Practice Plan Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +42%
Funded once
- HTHEALTHY TEEN NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue +114%
- NNNational Nurse-Led Care Consortiumgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +65%
- MVMON VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health education, injury prevention, and…
Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…
(see on schedule o)
Provision of charitable healthcare services
Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network, part of jefferson health. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health…
Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.
See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…
Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…
Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…
Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mazzoni Center and the most unlike its peers is Newlands Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Temple Faculty Practice Plan Inc ↗
- Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE ↗
- Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
- Who funds LCH Health and Community Services ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION-PLUS INC DBA EDUCATION PLUS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Bebashi-Transition to Hope ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds ActionAids Inc ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEWLANDS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA FIGHT ↗
- Who funds Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc ↗
- Who funds ADAGIO HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds MAZZONI CENTER ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PUENTES DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Co County Wellness Services DBA Berks Aids Network ↗
- Who funds The American Oncologic Hospital ↗
- Who funds Youth Alternatives INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FAMILY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds Main Line Hospitals Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers · Independence Blue Cross Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Philabundance · Independence Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · Philadelphia AIDS Thrift · Healthshare Exchange of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Accessmatters funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Healthy Teen Network Inc — 70% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.