· Public charity
Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers
The PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS (pachc) is a nonprofit association that supports pennsylvania's community health centers in improving health and access to affordable high-quality care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $672k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEYSTONE HEALTH CENTER | $37,625 |
| AMBULATORY HEALTH SERVICES | $35,744 |
| SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION | $31,982 |
| UNION COMMUNITY CARE | $28,219 |
| HAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC | $28,219 |
| MEADVILLE MEDICAL | $26,338 |
| BERKS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $26,338 |
| FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING | $26,338 |
| CORNERSTONE CARE | $26,338 |
| CENTERVILLE CLINICS INC | $26,338 |
| PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK | $26,338 |
| DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH | $24,566 |
| LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA | $24,457 |
| WAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH | $24,457 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT | $22,575 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC5× · 2017–2021 · $953k · revenue +194%- MMMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +48%
- LHLCH Health and Community Services9× · 2017–2025 · $227k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- OGOTHER GRANTS & OTHER ASSISTANCEone grant, 2021 · $264k
- CPCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +20%
- BHBrookville Hospitalone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
The full mission of the community health center of franklin county, inc is to maintain a community owned, responsive health center which promotes public health and well-being, and provides comprehensive preventative and primary care…
To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.
The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.
Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Health Partners Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Meadville Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LCH Health and Community Services ↗
- Who funds Consumer Health Coalition ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NET ↗
- Who funds WAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERVILLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BROAD TOP AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GLENDALE AREA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES COLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds B-K HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
- Who funds North Penn Comprehensive Health Services ↗
- Who funds SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH & DENTAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds MULTI-CULTURAL HEALTH EVALUATION DELIVERY SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Primary Care Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Accessmatters · Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Independence Blue Cross Foundation · Highmark Foundation · Pennsylvania Coalition for Oral Health · Family Health Council of Central Pa Inc · Healthshare Exchange of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.