Skip to content

· Private foundation

Patton M for Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$342kPhilanthropy$95kFood & Nutrition$94kHealth$92kYouth Development$88kEducation$72kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kReligion$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $158k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA$17,036
LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION$15,000
HAVIN$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$15,000
ARMSTRONG COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY$12,000
OPERATION WARM$12,000
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$11,820
LIFESTEPS INC$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CHESTNUT$10,000
PROGRESSIVE WORKSHOP OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY$10,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$8,000
FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE$6,000
WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 16%OPERATION WARM: $12k → 6%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 10%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $6k → 17%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $4k → 15%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 6%OPERATION WARM: $8k → 6%OPERATION WARM INC: $8k → 6%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $6k → 22%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 22%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 22%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 22%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 22%BEVERLYS BIRTHDAYS: $5k → 10%WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 22%BEVERLYS BIRTHDAYS: $3k → 10%BEVERLYS BIRTHDAYS: $1k → 10%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG CO: $6k → 13%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG CO: $6k → 13%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG CO: $6k → 13%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG CO: $6k → 13%REAGAN'S JOURNEY: $5k → 13%REAGAN'S JOURNEY: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
PA
NE
MO
KY
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$958k · 30 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
9

Total granted

$958k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+3%

Still filing today

60%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +13%
  • LI
    LIFESTEPS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +16%
  • OW
    Operation Warm Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • IU
    INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - NOR
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • AC
    ARMSTRONG CNTY CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAM SE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CHESTNUT RIDGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wesley Spectrum Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care .

Human Services
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Goodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania

Goodwill of southwestern pennsylvania is a human service agency and network of not-for-profit businesses whose mission is to strengthen communities, advance reuse and sustainability, and empower people to achieve their potential. see…

Employment
4
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
5
Wesley Family Services Foundation

Wesley family services foundation ("foundation") is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization and has been further classified as a type i supporting organization engaging in fund-raising, research and other charitable activities on behalf of…

Crime & Legal
6
Service Coordination Unlimited Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest quality of services to empower all people in their pursuit of independence and interdependence in a full and inclusive community.

Health
7
Fswp-Gl Iv Inc

Housing for the intellectual and developmental disability program clients of wesley family services and its member organization, family services of western pennsylvania

Human Services
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
10
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
11
United Way of the Csra Inc

United way of the csra mobilizes the caring power of our community to make lasting change on the issues that matter most in our region. we want to ensure that children, young adults, and families have the tools and resources they need to…

—
12
Adagio Health Inc

Adagio health promotes the health of women, men and children, with a focus on women, their families and their communities, by providing health and nutrition services and related educational programs throughout the commonwealth of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania; the most unlike its peers is Reagan's Journey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAVIN: $90,000 · OtherHAVINSALVATION ARMY: $80,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHYMCA: $44,036 · OtherYMCAARMSTRONG COUNTY CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMI: $37,500 · OtherARMSTRONG COUNTY CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMIIndividual grant recipient: $33,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS OF CHESTNUT: $30,000 · OtherINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $22,000 · OtherMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $21,400 · OtherSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF: $21,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $24,500 · Other+14 more: $120,679 · Other+14 moreOperation Warm Inc: $47,000 · Human ServicesOperation War…WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN: $30,500 · Human ServicesWHOSOEVER GOS…FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY: $24,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSE…REAGAN'S JOURNEY: $10,000 · Human ServicesREAGAN'S JOUR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…BEVERLY'S PGH: $8,500 · Human ServicesBEVERLY'S PGHFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $6,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesACCESSABILITIES INC: $28,800 · HealthACCESSABIL…LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE: $25,000 · HealthLUTHERAN S…Armstrong Center for Medicine & Health Inc: $20,000 · HealthArmstrong …BREATHE PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · HealthBREATHE PE…Spina Bifida Assoc of Western PA: $10,000 · HealthSpina Bifi…ARMSTRONG COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,500 · PhilanthropyARMSTRONG…LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLUTHERAN …THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $17,500 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITE…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…LIFESTEPS INC: $57,500 · EducationLIFESTEPS…STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $34,560 · EducationSTOREHOUS…GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $90,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…PROGRESSIVE WORKSHOP OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY INC: $40,000 · Employment
Other$570,915Human Services$138,500Health$103,800Philanthropy$95,000Education$92,060Food & Nutrition$90,000Employment$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESTEPS INC: $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE WORKSHOP OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARMSTRONG COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $34,560 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN: $30,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetACCESSABILITIES INC: $28,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIORLIFE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $24,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $21,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetArmstrong Center for Medicine & Health Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBREATHE PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpina Bifida Assoc of Western PA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP CADET: $6,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LIFESTEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE WORKSHOP OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMSTRONG COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND RES CUE HOME ASSO OF GERMANTOWN ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Make-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds Armstrong Center for Medicine & Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREATHE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds REAGAN'S JOURNEY ↗
  • Who funds Spina Bifida Assoc of Western PA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY'S PGH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patton M for Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patton M for Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patton M for Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph