· Public charity
Pact Inc
Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $24,887,981 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $80,958,822 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,070,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $853k
- $250k+9 grants · $24M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND EXCHANGE BOARD | $15,640,690 |
| THE ASIA FOUNDATION | $4,728,356 |
| JHPIEGO CORPORATION | $1,547,040 |
| GISA INC | $545,609 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS (ICFJ) | $369,026 |
| VIAMO PBC | $305,250 |
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL (FHI 360) | $297,230 |
| INTERNEWS NETWORK | $279,714 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT-LAW | $254,384 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND | $215,769 |
| OMDENA | $162,807 |
| MALAM DARFUR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT | $122,431 |
| TECHNOSERVE INC | $113,266 |
| PALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LLC | $102,827 |
| SOLIDARIDAD NORTH AMERICA | $80,753 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $56M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · GOVERNANCE PROGRAMS · HEALTH PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · ENGAGING MARKETS PROGRAMS · GOVERNANCE PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · GOVERNANCE PROGRAMS · HEALTH PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · GOVERNANCE PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · GOVERNANCE PROGRAMS · LIVELIHOODS PROGRAMS
Stated purpose: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS · ENGAGING MARKETS PROGRAMS · LIVELIHOODS PROGRAMS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $676k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC3× · 2022–2024 · $22M · revenue +37%
- ABAmerican Bar Association5× · 2019–2023 · $12M · revenue +31%
- TATHE ASIA FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +9%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Miamigraduatedone grant, 2017 · $556k · revenue +96%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $288k · revenue +361%
- WCWildlife Conservation Societygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $154k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Palladium Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association ↗
- Who funds THE ASIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds PALLADIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds MSI US ↗
- Who funds Equal Access International ↗
- Who funds GISA INC ↗
- Who funds NO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC ↗
- Who funds THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
- Who funds SOLIDARIDAD NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds EARTH MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MALAM-DARFUR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Counterpart International Inc · Internews Network · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pact Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Phandeeyar Foundation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.