· Public charity
Counterpart International Inc
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,730,145 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,603,946 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,873,801 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $444k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD VISION INC (WV) | $437,895 |
| DAI GLOBAL LLC (DAI) | $287,315 |
| CREATIVE ASSOCIATES | $269,756 |
| WELLINGTON PAGE INTERNATIONAL - 1119 | $254,031 |
| RAHMAN SAFI INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING RSIASP | $145,335 |
| VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY | $134,196 |
| SESAME WORKSHOP | $111,647 |
| IMAGINE WORLDWIDE | $53,201 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW ICNL FOR # 1081 | $22,457 |
| VIAMO PBC | $14,312 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $5.8M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $5.7M to organizations and $53k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: 8AM MEDIA_ASP AFGHANISTAN, 8AM MEDIA · ACSFO_ASP AFGHANISTAN, ACSFO · ACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT_ASP AFGHANISTAN, ACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: CENTRO DE APRENDIZAGEM E CAPACITACAO DA SOCIEDADE CIVIL (CESC)_LEADING PARTNER IN ADVOCACY AND CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES, LEVERAGING ITS PROVEN CAPABILITIES IN ADVOCACY. · ASSOCIACAO PROGRESSO_LEADING PARTNER IN ADVOCACY AND CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES, LEVERAGING ITS PROVEN CAPABILITIES IN ADVOCACY. · ASSOCIATION HIMMA_BRING DECISION MAKERS AND CITIZENS TO PROMOTE COMMUNES' GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CITIZEN CONTROL OF PUBLIC ACTION FOR BETTER DELIVERY OF SERVICES, AND TO INCREASE THE LEVEL UNDERSTANDING OF CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND DUTIES IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE.
Stated purpose: AL TADHAMUN_AL TADHAMUN · AL-NAJAH CENTER FORTRAINING & DEVELOPMENT_AL-NAJAH CENTER FORTRAINING & DEVELOPMENT · PAO-PUBLIC AID ORGANIZATION_PAO-PUBLIC AID ORGANIZATION
Stated purpose: FOUNDATION FOR STUDIES FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW (FESPAD)_STRENGHTENING CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS FOR CITIZEN SECURITY DD-1078-2023-010 · IXCHEL WOMEN ASSOCIATION IN THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION_INCREASED VISIBILITY, MONITORING OF, AND ADVOCACY TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM OF MISSING PERSONS IN EL SALVADOR-DD-1078-2023-012 · ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNAL SALVADOREAN PROMOTORS (APROCSAL)_STRENGTHEN THE CAPACITIES OF THE COMMUNITY TO DEFEND AND PROMOTE HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MUNICIPALITYOF JIQUILISCO, USULUTN DD-1078-2023-011
Stated purpose: ARMENIAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION_ENHANCE THE FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF CSOS · ARMENIAN UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION NGO_POLICY CHANGE ON YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL DECISION-MAKING · BAYAZET ARMENIAN ANALYTICAL RESEARCH CENTER_TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR COMMUNITY BASED BUDGETING
Stated purpose: ASSOCIAODEFICIENTESDE TIMOR-LESTE (ADTL)_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY · COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION NETWORK TIMOR-LESTE (CBRNTL)_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY · FUNDAO HAFOUN TIMOR LOROSAE (FHTL_STRENGTHENING ADVOCACY
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 37% of Counterpart International Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC3× · 2017–2019 · $10M · revenue +86%
- ININTERNEWS NETWORK3× · 2017–2019 · $10M · revenue +109%
- ICINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +4%
Funded once
- MSMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALone grant, 2021 · $1.9M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $262k
- ACADAPT CONSULTING LLCone grant, 2021 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.
Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…
In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Ili's mission is fostering prosperity through the rule of law. ili believes that economic growth and effective governance is achieved through a sound legal infrastructure. ili's mission is to raise the levels of professional competence and…
The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…
To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Foundation for Electoral Systems and the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Equal Access International ↗
- Who funds THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ELECTORAL SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SENIOR LAWYERS'CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Family Health International Inc · Pact Inc · National Endowment for Democracy · Foundation to Promote Open Society · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Ford Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Counterpart International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.