Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$273k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$380kEducation$283kRecreation & Sports$253kHuman Services$211kYouth Development$150kHousing & Shelter$120kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $221k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UAMS$120,000
OUR HOUSE$101,200
Individual grant recipient$30,000
ROTARY CLUB OF LITTLE ROCK$15,000
ARKANSAS FOOD BANK$2,000
POTLUCK$1,200
PARK$1,200
UNION RESCUE MISSION$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $125k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+14%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $211k · revenue +92%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • AF
    ARKANSAS FOODBANK
    8× · 2019–2026 · $19k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $44k
  • AH
    ARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
2
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
3
The Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind Inc

To improve occupational opportunity and public perception of legally blind arkansans through community engagement, work skills enhancement and the production of quality goods and services.

—
4
United Way of Southeast Ark Inc

Fund raising and agency allocations

—
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
7
Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.

Food & Nutrition
8
Arkansas Baptist Children's Home & Family Ministries

We build, strengthen and restore arkansas families for god's glory.

Human Services
9
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
10
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Arkansas Rice Depot Inc

The arkansas rice depot provides food for the needy through the distribution of rice contributed by rice producers in the state of arkansas and distributing it to local pantries and other food banks in the state.

—
12
Every Arkansan Inc

To reach out to our community, serve the needs, and help improve the lives of those we serve.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arkansas Foodbank; the most unlike its peers is Union Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LR: $261,499 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LROUR HOUSE INC: $211,300 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $202,560 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAELIndividual grant recipient: $177,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientURJ HENRY S JACOBS CAMP: $155,000 · OtherURJ HENRY S JACOBS CAMPUAMS: $141,500 · OtherUAMSCARTI: $100,000 · OtherCARTIPARK: $99,300 · OtherPARK+8 more: $166,850 · Other+8 moreWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $205,000 · Human ServicesWORLD SERVI…NATURAL STATE COUNCIL: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS FOODBANK: $18,600 · Food & NutritionPOTLUCK INC: $8,800 · Food & NutritionUNION RESCUE MISSION: $11,100 · Housing & ShelterARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthARKANSAS POLICY FOUNDATION: $750 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,515,009Human Services$205,000Youth Development$150,000Arts & Culture$50,000Food & Nutrition$27,400Housing & Shelter$11,100Health$10,000Crime & Legal$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $211,300 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $205,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetNATURAL STATE COUNCIL: $150,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $18,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $11,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPOTLUCK INC: $8,800 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetARKANSAS POLICY FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF LITTLE ROCK ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POTLUCK INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS POLICY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Brown Foundation · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · John R & Judy W Fletcher Family Foundation · Lpr Foundation · Riggs Benevolent Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ottenheimer Brothers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph