Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Osage Initiatives

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
17%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$612k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations Osage Initiatives funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$60k23%
FY202412$48k17%
FY202310$40k40%
FY202211$44k9%
FY202112$34k42%
FY202012$40k67%
FY20198$32k38%
FY20188$32k38%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$90kFood & Nutrition$86kPhilanthropy$41kCommunity Improvement$41kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$29kHealth$28kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 27 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($79k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Osage Initiatives supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Angel Heart: $40,581 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Western Stock Show Association: $33,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Police Foundation: $32,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetProfessionals Miracles Foundation Co Teresa Powers: $23,279 over 6y, 12% of budgetDenver Health and Hospitals Foundation: $18,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDtc Shares Foundation: $17,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetSenior Housing Options Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCobbled Streets-Helping Homeless & Foster Kids Move Forward: $9,319 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSharing Ministries Inc: $7,278 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWeld Food Bank: $5,199 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of the Rockies: $5,140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBessies Hope: $4,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Indian College Fund: $3,190 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetReel Recovery Inc: $2,520 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDorcas Circle: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCraig Hospital: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $2,079 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGunnison Country Food Pantry Inc: $2,070 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBig Dogs Huge Paws Inc: $2,031 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWesternaires Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProject Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Sports Center for the Disabled Inc: $1,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Wild Animal Sanctuary: $1,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Daniels Fund · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Osage Initiatives with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Osage Initiatives?

Find your warmest path to Osage Initiatives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Osage Initiatives

How much does Osage Initiatives give?
Osage Initiatives reported 14 grants totaling $59,533 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Osage Initiatives fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Safety & Disaster (24%), Food & Nutrition (23%), Philanthropy (11%).
Who are Osage Initiatives's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Volunteers of America Inc ($58k), Project Angel Heart ($41k), The Western Stock Show Association ($33k).
Does Osage Initiatives fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Osage Initiatives accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Osage Initiatives?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Colorado Gives Foundation, The Denver Foundation, Anschutz Family Foundation.
Where is Osage Initiatives based?
Osage Initiatives is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Osage Initiatives’ filings →

More from the funding graph