Skip to content
Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation

To create, expand and encourage home ownership opportunities for oregonians at or below local median income.

$126k
Granted FY2022
26
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Housing & Shelter$570kHuman Services$86kCommunity Improvement$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kYouth Development$5kEnvironment$3k
02FY2022 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k25 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES$14,000
MCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$9,000
NEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$9,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY$5,000
TILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL LANE$5,000
WEST TUALITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
COLUMBIA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY$5,000
BEND-REDMOND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LA PINE SUNRIVER$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLANDMETRO EAST$5,000
KOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$5,000
GRANTS PASS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LINCOLN COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $5k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM - ABCS OF HOMEBUYING: $5k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCEITY OF LANE COUNTY: $5k → 15%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $5k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $3k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCEITY OF LANE COUNTY: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM - LEND-A-HAND PROGRAM: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$622k · 26 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$622k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+20%

Still filing today

92%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY
    4× · 2017–2022 · $105k · revenue +109%
  • A
    ACCESS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +232%
  • CN
    CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +814%

Funded once

  • NA
    National Association of Realtors
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • CC
    COOS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • CG
    COTTAGE GROVE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia Gorge Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Columbia Gorge Habitat for Humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
3
Habitat for Humanity East Bay Silicon Valley

We believe everyone deserves a decent place to live. by building, preserving, and expanding fair access to affordable homeownership, habitat partners with people and families to build strong futures on the foundation of a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat for Humanity of Bucks County Inc

Building Communities, Empowering Families

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity of Sumner Coun

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to relive our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of sumner county…

—
8
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity of Snohomish County

Habitat for humanity snohomish county strives to eliminate substandard housing and end the cycle of poverty by partnering with homeowners to build, repair, and preserve decent and affordable homes in our neighborhoods. with support from…

—
10
Habitat for Humanity - Central Berkshire

Cbhfh, an affordable housing developer who brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. cbhfh partners with low and moderate income families to build and rehabilitate simple, decent, energy efficient homes for home…

Housing & Shelter
11
Ottumwa Habitat for Humanity

Construct and sell houses to low income families at cost.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of Marion County

Seeking to put God's love into action, we bring people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East; the most unlike its peers is National Association of Realtors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
31/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCESS: $45,000 · OtherACCESSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FINDLAYHANCOCK COUNTY: $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FINDLAYHANCOCK COUNTYCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $34,000 · OtherCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL LANE: $31,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL LANEMCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $26,240 · OtherMCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYNational Association of Realtors: $20,303 · OtherTILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $20,000 · OtherPORTLAND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT INITIATIVES INC: $18,000 · OtherAFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP: $18,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP: $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MT ANGEL AREA INC: $15,000 · OtherHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $13,000 · OtherCommunity Energy Project Inc: $13,000 · Other+9 more: $49,000 · Other+9 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $105,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEYUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPProud Ground: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterProud GroundCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORP: $19,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORPPORTLAND HOUSING CENTER: $18,000 · Housing & ShelterPORTLAND HOUSING CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO …KOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORIMPACT: $18,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Team: $8,000 · Human ServicesREFIT REMODELING FOR INDEPENDENCE TOGETHER: $5,000 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · InternationalKLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES: $10,000 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC NW: $8,000 · EducationNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUR UNITED VILLAGES: $3,000 · Environment
Other$382,543Housing & Shelter$230,000Human Services$41,000International$30,000Community Improvement$10,000Education$8,000Youth Development$5,000Environment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $105,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetACCESS: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CENTRAL LANE: $31,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetProud Ground: $28,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $26,240 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNational Association of Realtors: $20,303 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTILLAMOOK COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORP: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT INITIATIVES INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND HOUSING CENTER: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP: $18,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MT ANGEL AREA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Energy Project Inc: $13,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES: $10,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetNEWBERG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC NW: $8,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCommunity Action Team: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia County Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LINCOLN COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLORENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of La Pine Sunriver: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREFIT REMODELING FOR INDEPENDENCE TOGETHER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPHINE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetWest Tuality Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR UNITED VILLAGES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Meyer Memorial TrustHabitat for Humanity …Umpqua Bank Charitabl…Habitat for Humanity …The Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…Washington Federal Fo…The Ford Family Found…Marie Lamfrom Charita…First Interstate Banc…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR51.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Klamath & Lake Community Action Services: 77% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes: 63% of income from government
  • Columbia Cascade Housing Corp: 53% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation: 48% of income from government
  • Portland Community Reinvestment Initiatives Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Community Action Team: 29% of income from government
  • Columbia County Habitat for Humanity: 25% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center: 19% of income from government
  • Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity: 17% of income from government
  • African American Alliance for Homeownership: 17% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East: 14% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp: 12% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Proud Ground: 11% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul Society of Lane County Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Energy Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Oregon Association of Realtors Home Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $132k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Association of Realtors Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home