· Private foundation
Oral Health International Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $290k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHILIA MISSION KENYA | $25,000 |
| SMILEFAITH INC | $15,000 |
| FOOTBRIDGE | $15,000 |
| WATER AT WORK MINISTRY | $13,500 |
| PEER SERVANTS | $11,713 |
| CASA COLIBRI | $10,000 |
| GEORGIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT | $10,000 |
| SUSAN DEW HOFF MEMORIAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT | $10,000 |
| THE DOCTORS' VOLUNTEER CLINIC | $10,000 |
| SMILES INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SONRISAS FELICES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 82% of grant dollars ($1.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 18% that went abroad ($366k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 18% of all-years giving ($366k)
16 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
139 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 111 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DVDOCTORS' VOLUNTEER CLINIC4× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +48%
- IDIOWA DENTAL FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +215%
- GDGLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF5× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- MDMEMPHIS DENTAL SOCIETY CHARITABLE FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue ×17 · 65% of their budget
- TFTHE FLOATING HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +15%
- FDFONDATION DE LORDE DES DENTISTES DU QUEBECone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide quality dental care and oral health education in a safe, compassionate, and accessible environment serving low-income, uninsured, under-insured, and medicaid populations of miami county.
Delivery of oral healthcare. the corporation operates principally for the benefit of the school of dentistry of vcu by supporting the education, research, service and care mission of vcu.
Providing oral health education and improving access to dental care for the uninsured, low-income children and families of miami-dade county.
To improve the overall health of qualified low-wage earning adults in bucks and montgomery counties by providing free preventative and restorative dental services and oral health education.
At the gdad foundation, we believe that everyone deserves access to quality dental care and education, regardless of their circumstances. dental health is a critical component of overall well-being, and our mission is to provide charitable…
The mission of jessie trice community health system, inc. (the orgainzation) is to improve health equality for our diverse south florida community by providing and increasing access to quality comprehensive primary care services. please…
To provide oral health care to low income populations, to provide dental care to those in need in the service area.
To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.
To enhance the lives of our community by providing education and improved access to personal, integrated, team-based, and evidence-focused medical, dental and behavioral healthcare.
The organization's purpose is to deliver free medical care to the underserved, indigent peoples in asia and the pacific islands through medical and surgical missions. in hawaii, the organization operates the only free dental clinic in the…
The mission of the family health centers at nyu langone is to improve the overall health of the communities it serves by delivering high quality, culturally-competent primary car, and related services within community-based settings.
Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Foundation of Dentistry and the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 262 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOTBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds DOCTORS' VOLUNTEER CLINIC ↗
- Who funds IOWA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SUSAN DEW HOFF MEMORIAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO MISSION OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURA SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds ANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OASIS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GoochlandCares ↗
- Who funds CASA COLIBRI ↗
- Who funds HEALING CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE CORNERS OF THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE MAKING MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND FOUNDATION OF DENTISTRY ↗
- Who funds HAITI OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Patterson Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Americares Foundation Inc · Highmark Foundation · Direct Relief · Carequest Foundation Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Sostento Inc · Cvs Foundation · Delta Dental of Virginia Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oral Health International Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Ministry of Caring Inc — 30% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oral Health International Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Oral Health International Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.