Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aven Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$9.1MEducation$8.4MHousing & Shelter$2.8MHuman Services$1.9MEmployment$1.7MPhilanthropy$719kYouth Development$620kFood & Nutrition$530kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k33 grants · $730k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $7.2M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CTR$3,249,282
WHITMAN COLLEGE$3,000,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT$500,000
RYTHER CHILD CENTER$500,000
BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$245,079
YEAR UP$200,000
FARESTART$100,000
WASHINGTON WOMEN IN NEED$100,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR LEARNING$100,000
AKIN$50,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF WASHINGTON$50,000
VINE MAPLE PLACE$50,000
HOPELINK$50,000
RAINIER PREP$50,000
YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPERATION WARM: $20k → 10%OPERATION WARM: $15k → 10%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 10%SCARLET ROAD: $10k → 10%GIRLS WHO CODE: $50k → 17%SOUND GENERATION: $30k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $25k → 9%LIFE WIRE: $25k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $25k → 9%VISION HOUSE: $50k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $25k → 9%BIRTHDAY DREAMS: $5k → 9%BIRTHDAY DREAMS: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $25k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $30k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $50k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%HOPELINK: $50k → 9%AKIN: $50k → 9%WESTSIDE BABY: $20k → 9%TOYS FOR KIDS: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $50k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $39k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $50k → 9%AMARA: $65k → 9%FAMILY LAW (CASA): $20k → 9%AMARA: $50k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $20k → 9%ISSAQUAH FOOD & CLOTHING BANK: $10k → 9%AMARA: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
MD
NC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Aven Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 70% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Aven Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 52 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
67

Total granted

$13M
$9.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+14%

Still filing today

79%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +63%
  • H
    HOPELINK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +48%
  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $375k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1.8M
  • CN
    CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
4
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
5
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
6
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
7
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
8
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
9
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
10
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
11
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
12
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cares of Washington and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent Day SchoolsFaith-Based Healthcare Syst…Early Childhood Development…Education Access & Workforc…Youth Mentoring & LeadershipMuseums and Cultural Herita…Community Foundations and G…Food Banks and Hunger ReliefSupportive Housing & Mental…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr19%42%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr12%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr12%55%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/87
the rest of the field
14%
1,719/12,652

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/86
Grantees still filing
58/86
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CTR — $3,249,282 · OtherFRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH CTRIndividual grant recipient — $2,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,800,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER — $1,000,000 · OtherCATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTERUW SHELL HOUSE — $1,000,000 · OtherUW SHELL HOUSERYTHER CHILD CENTER — $525,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT — $500,000 · Other+79 more — $4,096,882 · Other+79 moreBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $6,150,000 · EducationBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEG…YEAR UP INC — $1,000,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $555,079 · EducationBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION+8 more — $655,000 · Education+8 moreHOPELINK — $400,000 · Human ServicesAMARA — $165,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $100,000 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE PLACE — $100,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY — $79,000 · Human ServicesLifeWire — $75,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $50,000 · Human ServicesVISION HOUSE — $50,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE SOPHIA WAY — $50,000 · Human Services+13 more — $265,000 · Human ServicesCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS — $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground Washington — $145,000 · Housing & ShelterROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER — $80,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE — $45,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterFARESTART — $575,000 · EmploymentCARES OF WASHINGTON — $50,000 · EmploymentSUMMER SEARCH — $30,000 · EmploymentNORTHWEST CENTER — $25,000 · EmploymentOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTH — $100,000 · HealthOLIVE CREST — $75,000 · HealthBUILDING CHANGES — $55,000 · HealthAcres of Diamonds — $50,000 · HealthBEST DENTAL HELP — $20,000 · HealthKIDS AND PAPER — $20,000 · HealthFOOD LIFELINE — $375,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$14,171,164Education$8,360,079Human Services$1,384,000Housing & Shelter$1,320,000Employment$680,000Health$570,000Food & Nutrition$375,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $6,150,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS — $1,000,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFARESTART — $575,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $555,079 over 4y, 17% of budgetHOPELINK — $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $375,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $225,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetWashington Women in Need — $200,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetTOGETHER CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetAMARA — $165,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $145,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR LEARNING — $120,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $110,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRAINIER PREP — $100,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER — $80,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS — $80,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY — $79,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetLifeWire — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHARVEST AGAINST HUNGER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES — $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetATTAIN HOUSING — $55,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARES OF WASHINGTON — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEASHARE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVISION HOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMAGINE HOUSING — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOPHIA WAY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAcres of Diamonds — $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAY BACK INN FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetOperation Warm Inc — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER — $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCollege Success Foundation — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaris Place — $35,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle High School ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Washington Women in Need ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMARA ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER PREP ↗
  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LifeWire ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…United Way of King Co…Medina FoundationMoccasin Lake Foundat…Liberty Mutual Founda…Washington Federal Fo…Lucky Seven FoundationWindermere FoundationEllison FoundationFales Foundation Trust
The Norcliffe FoundationWA84.4× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Windermere Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Fales Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aven Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Just Compassion of East Washington County — 4% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines