· Private foundation
Omni Cable Foundation
Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k46 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION | $25,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONTDELCO | $2,500 |
| NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC | $2,000 |
| FACE TO FACE | $1,000 |
| THE ELKS LODGE #2587 | $1,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTERSCHOOL EDUCATION | $1,000 |
| MOVEMBER FOUNDATION | $510 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $500 |
| WORLD VISION | $494 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $450 |
| BRINGING HOPE HOME | $309 |
| AMIGOS FOR CHRIST | $250 |
| PREGNANT AID CLINIC | $250 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $250 |
| GIFT OF LIFE DONOR | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION2× · 2017–2018 · $51k · revenue +94%
- NENORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +44%
- TPTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- MVMERCY VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SISTERS OF MERCYone grant, 2017 · $8k
- BCBAC CANCER TRANSPORTATION FUNDone grant, 2017 · $2k
- FOFRIENDS OF TROOP 661one grant, 2017 · $750
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.
Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Taste of History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOOKS FOR THE BARRIOS INC ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds BRINGING HOPE HOME ↗
- Who funds Ride To Give Inc ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds West Whiteland Fire Company Inc ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds TAKE A BREATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Amigos For Christ Inc ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PETER'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LORD'S PANTRY OF DOWNINGTOWN ↗
- Who funds WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY TOOLBANK INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
- Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Td Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Genuardi Family Foundation · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Omni Cable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Omni Cable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Omni Cable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.