Skip to content

· Private foundation

Omni Cable Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2018
47
Grants FY2018
15
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$60kHuman Services$7kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$3kYouth Development$2kInternational$1kFood & Nutrition$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2018 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k46 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$100
Median grant
15
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION$25,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONTDELCO$2,500
NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC$2,000
THE ELKS LODGE #2587$1,000
FACE TO FACE$1,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTERSCHOOL EDUCATION$1,000
MOVEMBER FOUNDATION$510
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$500
WORLD VISION$494
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$450
BRINGING HOPE HOME$309
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$250
PREGNANT AID CLINIC$250
AMIGOS FOR CHRIST$250
GIFT OF LIFE DONOR$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC: $2k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%LAUREL HOUSE: $50 → 7%NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC: $2k → 9%LORD'S PANTRY OF DOWNINGTOWN: $100 → 6%LORD'S PANTRY OF DOWNINGTOWN: $100 → 6%FACE TO FACE: $1k → 22%FACE TO FACE: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 16 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
29

Total granted

$62k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+53%

Still filing today

81%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $51k · revenue +94%
  • NE
    NORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +44%
  • TP
    THE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • MV
    MERCY VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SISTERS OF MERCY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • BC
    BAC CANCER TRANSPORTATION FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TROOP 661
    one grant, 2017 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Taste of History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
37/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION: $50,750 · EducationHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION+5 more: $2,410 · EducationMERCY VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SISTERS OF MERCY: $8,250 · OtherMERCY VOCATIONAL HIGH SCH…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONTDELCO: $2,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MONT…BAC CANCER TRANSPORTATION FUND: $2,000 · OtherBAC CANCER TRANSPORTATION…THE ELKS LODGE #2587: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF TROOP 661: $750 · Other+38 more: $4,578 · Other+38 moreNORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNORTH EAS…FACE TO FACE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFACE TO F…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $730 · Human ServicesAmerican …+3 more: $300 · Human ServicesMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $885 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $700 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $450 · HealthBRINGING HOPE HOME: $309 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $262 · HealthTAKE A BREATHER FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 · Health+4 more: $235 · HealthWORLD VISION INC: $914 · InternationalAmigos For Christ Inc: $250 · InternationalCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $60 · InternationalHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC: $325 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $104 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $50 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50 · PhilanthropyA TASTE OF HISTORY: $25 · PhilanthropyWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $175 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $146 · Food & Nutrition
Education$53,160Other$19,078Human Services$7,030Health$3,341International$1,224Philanthropy$604Food & Nutrition$321

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION: $50,750 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH EAST WESTCHESTER SPECIAL RECREATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $914 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $885 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $730 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR THE BARRIOS INC: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRINGING HOPE HOME: $309 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRide To Give Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos For Christ Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKE A BREATHER FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLORD'S PANTRY OF DOWNINGTOWN: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $146 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTreetops Animal Rescue: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSaint Josephs Family Hope Center: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA TASTE OF HISTORY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Td Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Genuardi Family Foundation · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Omni Cable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Omni Cable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Omni Cable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Omni Cable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Omni Cable’s filings →

More from the funding graph