· Private foundation
Oleson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $866k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $609k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TART TRAILS | $77,000 |
| TRAVERSE BAY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $76,000 |
| NW MI FOOD COALITION | $75,000 |
| CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE | $62,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN | $57,900 |
| GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $55,000 |
| GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY | $54,000 |
| GRAND TRAVERSE BAY YMCA | $52,000 |
| GRASS RIVER NATURAL AREA | $50,000 |
| LEELANAU CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| NORTE | $42,500 |
| THE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION | $36,040 |
| CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY | $35,000 |
| ZONTA CLUB OF TRAVERSE CITY | $34,171 |
| THE WATERSHED CENTER | $34,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $633k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
107 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GTGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY9× · 2017–2025 · $391k · revenue +321%
- NMNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $368k · revenue +53%
- TATRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $321k · revenue +334%
Funded once
- DFDIRECTORS FUNDone grant, 2024 · $90k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $70k
- TATHOMPSONVILLE AREA REVITALIZATION PROJECone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever
To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special
To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.
A provider of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) which is a community-based, long-term care delivery program that provides comprehensive, coordinated, managed care to eligible participants.
To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.
To provide facilities for nonprofit organizations to enjoy the experience of nature in michigan, promote ourdoor education, and to offer camping enjoyment to the people of midland county.
To create and preserve quality affordable housing options for northern michigan residents through education, development, and partnering with local communities.
To protect and restore central michigan's land, water, and wildlife resources to improve the quality of life for all.
To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Michigan Community Action and the most unlike its peers is The Rock of Kingsley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 199 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE BAY YMCA ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTE YOUTH CYCLING ↗
- Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEEDS ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY CENTER GREAT LAKES ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC ↗
- Who funds THE ROCK OF KINGSLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CITY OPERA HOUSE HERITAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Les & Ann Biederman Foundation Inc · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · Green Brick Foundation Inc · Frey Foundation · United Way of Northwest Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oleson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oleson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Oleson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.