· Community foundation
Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation
We spark positive change by inspiring generosity, caring for resources, and supporting our communities, now and forever.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 116 grants below total $3,154,318 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,008,624 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $854,306 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $239k
- $10k–50k66 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $343k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRAL LAKE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $342,944 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NW MICHIGAN | $125,749 |
| LEELANAU COMMUNITY CULTURAL CENTER | $113,360 |
| PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $109,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $91,295 |
| WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE GRAND TRAVERSE AREA | $87,005 |
| CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN | $82,490 |
| 5LOAVES2FISH NMI | $76,770 |
| TRAVERSE BAY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $72,668 |
| GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY | $72,560 |
| LELAND PUBLIC SCHOOL | $68,500 |
| CHARLEVOIX EMMET INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $60,000 |
| INLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $58,035 |
| LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS | $55,450 |
| LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER | $51,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
159 repeat relationships — 103 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +35%
- POPAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL9× · 2017–2025 · $970k · revenue +64%
- GTGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY9× · 2017–2025 · $778k · revenue +321%
Funded once
- TCTRAVERSE CITY & GARFIELD TWP RECREATION AUTHORITYone grant, 2019 · $239k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $68k
- CUCENTRAL UNITED METHODISTone grant, 2020 · $52k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
To stimulate and sustain a vibrant regional economy by facilitating economic growth and prosperity.
To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.
We advocate and facilitate the development of a network of multipurpose recreational trails in Northern Lower Michigan.
Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever
To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…
Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Michigan Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Maraschino Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
177 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 177 of the 269 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOOLS OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds INLAND SEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER GRAND TRAVERSE AREA ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Grand Traverse Pavilions Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE BAY YMCA ↗
- Who funds GENERATIONS AHEAD ↗
- Who funds OLD ART BUILDING ↗
- Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF POINT BETSIE LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTE YOUTH CYCLING ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA D/B/A TRAVERSE CITY PHILHARMONIC ↗
- Who funds 5LOAVES2FISHNMI ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Oleson Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Les & Ann Biederman Foundation Inc · Jim and Diana Huckle Family Foundation · Green Brick Foundation Inc · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Impact 100 of Traverse City Inc · United Way of Northwest Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.