· Public charity
New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls
Newmexicowomen.org (nmw.o) is a statewide women's fund that works to advance opportunities for women and girls so that they can lead healthy, self-sufficient and empowered lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k48 grants · $957k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $178k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OLE EDUCATION FUND | $63,000 |
| EQUALITY NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $58,000 |
| SOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER | $57,000 |
| CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY | $42,000 |
| COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST | $32,000 |
| SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NW | $29,000 |
| BLACK HEALTH NEW MEXICO | $28,000 |
| TEWA WOMEN UNITED | $28,000 |
| TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NM | $28,000 |
| NM FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT | $26,000 |
| NM ASIAN FAMILY CENTER | $25,500 |
| BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE | $25,000 |
| BOLD FUTURES NM | $24,500 |
| NM COMMUNIDADES EN ACCION Y DE FE | $24,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $836k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT5× · 2020–2024 · $132k · revenue +1%
- LSLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER6× · 2019–2024 · $122k · revenue +202%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC6× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +188%
Funded once
NEO Philanthropy Incone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +1%- SNSTRENGTHENING NATIONS INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
- BOBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACEone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.
El centro de igualdad y derechos is a civil rights and workers justice organization based in central new mexico that combines organizing, leadership development, information campaigns, and policy education.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Mission: help people affected by domestic violence, sexual violence and other forms of abuse, in otero and lincoln counties, new mexico by providing a comprehensive array of direct services, including crisis intervention, shelter,…
Provide legal assistance in proceedings or matters to persons financially unable to afford legal assistance in the state of new mexico, excluding san juan county.
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
We are a values-driven advocacy organization committed to defending and expanding consumer protections, corporate and insurance accountability, and access to justice in New Mexico. Our work is led by consumers, survivors of sexual assault,…
Newmexicowomen.org (nmw.o) is a statewide women's fund that works to advance opportunities for women and girls so that they can lead healthy, self-sufficient and empowered lives.
The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.
Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Little Globe Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE OLE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS ↗
- Who funds BLACK HEALTH NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds HEALING CIRCLE DROP IN CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Equality New Mexico Foundation ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO WELLNESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds Flowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BOLD FUTURES NM ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
- Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds NM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe ↗
- Who funds VITAL SPACES INC ↗
- Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
- Who funds EL REFUGIO ↗
- Who funds EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Groundswell Fund · Center for Civic Policy
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls?
Find your warmest path to New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.