Skip to content

· Public charity

New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs

To utilize training, research, policy and community engagement towards our goal to address and end sexual violence in new mexico.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$17MHuman Services$15MCrime & Legal$5.1MCivil Rights$172kCommunity Improvement$169kEducation$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.7M
$108,069
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM$1,105,967
ARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES$738,225
VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES$700,875
SILVER REGIONAL SASS$688,484
CASA FORTALEZA$577,760
SOLACE CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER$575,563
COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE$421,125
LA PINON$303,447
COPE$294,173
AFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES$252,647
ALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE CENT$209,104
ROBERTAS PLACE$195,837
ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE$187,318
NM ASIAN FAMILY CENTER$180,933
THE ROSWELL REFUGE SANE$120,382
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $421k → 18%ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE: $229k → 19%Valencia Shelter Services: $280k → 19%Families and Youth Inc CAC: $32k → 23%Coal to STOP Violence ANW: $75k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $411k → 18%ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE: $222k → 19%Valencia Shelter Services: $243k → 19%Coal to STOP Violence ANW: $70k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $318k → 18%ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE: $187k → 19%Valencia Shelter Services: $84k → 19%COPE: $294k → 20%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $246k → 18%ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE: $126k → 19%Valencia Shelter Services: $60k → 19%COPE: $169k → 20%LA PINON: $515k → 23%Community Against Violence: $239k → 18%ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE: $122k → 19%VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES: $701k → 19%La Pinon: $508k → 23%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $237k → 18%Alternative to Violence: $118k → 19%VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES: $676k → 19%Chaves County CAC: $46k → 20%LA PINON: $448k → 23%Community Against Violence: $165k → 18%Alternative to Violence: $83k → 19%VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES: $345k → 19%CHAVES COUNTY CAC: $41k → 20%LA PINON: $303k → 23%Alternative to Violence: $83k → 19%VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES: $340k → 19%La Pinon: $296k → 23%Alternative to Violence: $65k → 19%LA PINON: $294k → 23%Community Against Violence: $35k → 18%Childhaven: $68k → 22%LA PINON: $260k → 23%Community Against Violence: $35k → 18%CHILDHAVEN: $53k → 22%La Pinon: $196k → 23%La Pinon: $191k → 23%All Faiths: $177k → 14%TEWA Women United: $97k → 12%TEWA Women United: $27k → 12%ALL FAITHS: $101k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 36 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
5

Total granted

$37M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+35%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +107% · 52% of their budget
  • LP
    LA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +121% · 26% of their budget
  • VS
    VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • IP
    IMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY
    one grant, 2024 · $31k · revenue 0%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
2
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
3
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
4
Community Beyond Violence

CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

—
5
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
6
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
7
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

Human Services
9
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
10
Sexual Assault Victim Advocate Center

To provide direct service, advocacy and support to those affected by sexual assault in larimer county, colorado. this is accomplished through crisis intervention, therapy, education, and support services.

Education
11
Skagit Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services

To end domestic violence and sexual assault in skagit county through empowerment, advocacy, education, awareness, and prevention.

Human Services
12
Crime Victim Advocacy Center of St Louis

Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center of Protective Environment Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids Inc Child Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
30/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM: $5,039,968 · HealthSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNMSILVER REGIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SERVICES: $2,630,512 · HealthSILVER REGIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SER…CASA FORTALEZA: $2,338,420 · HealthCASA FORTALEZAARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $2,210,219 · HealthARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICESSt Vincent Hospital: $886,199 · HealthSt Vincent HospitalSOUTHERN NEW MEXICO WELLNESS ALLIANCE: $535,025 · Health+4 more: $221,418 · HealthLA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY: $3,011,202 · Human ServicesLA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERYVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $2,727,881 · Human ServicesVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC …COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $2,107,533 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INCALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE: $1,895,827 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVEALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $1,233,679 · Human ServicesALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCENEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER: $884,221 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTERCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $485,335 · Human Services+7 more: $1,054,887 · Human Services+7 moreSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $1,860,892 · OtherSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAU…Roosevelt General Hospital: $1,719,674 · OtherRoosevelt General H…CARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL: $906,472 · OtherCARRIE TINGLEY HOSP…ROSWELL REFUGE FOR BATTERED ADULTS: $772,997 · OtherROSWELL REFUGE FOR …THE ARC OF NEW MEXICO: $352,834 · OtherTHE ARC OF NEW MEXI…UNM MEDICAL GROUP INC: $340,224 · Other+7 more: $493,285 · Other+7 moreRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $1,358,438 · Crime & LegalRAPE CRIS…AFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES: $709,840 · Crime & LegalAFFIRMING…The Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center: $583,706 · Crime & LegalThe Phoen…ROBERTA'S PLACE INC: $377,600 · Crime & LegalROBERTA'S…KIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $147,976 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $31,168 · Crime & Legal
Health$13,861,761Human Services$13,400,565Other$6,446,378Crime & Legal$3,208,728

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM: $5,039,968 over 9y, 52% of budgetLA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY: $3,011,202 over 9y, 26% of budgetVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $2,727,881 over 8y, 24% of budgetSILVER REGIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SERVICES: $2,630,512 over 9y, 83% of budgetCASA FORTALEZA: $2,338,420 over 9y, 51% of budgetARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $2,210,219 over 3y, 92% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $2,107,533 over 9y, 11% of budgetALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE: $1,895,827 over 9y, 48% of budgetSOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $1,860,892 over 9y, 29% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO: $1,358,438 over 8y, 26% of budgetALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $1,233,679 over 9y, 42% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital: $886,199 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER: $884,221 over 9y, 10% of budgetROSWELL REFUGE FOR BATTERED ADULTS: $772,997 over 9y, 16% of budgetAFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES: $709,840 over 7y, 10% of budgetThe Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center: $583,706 over 6y, 28% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW MEXICO WELLNESS ALLIANCE: $535,025 over 9y, 84% of budgetCENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC: $485,335 over 3y, 12% of budgetROBERTA'S PLACE INC: $377,600 over 3y, 20% of budgetTHE ARC OF NEW MEXICO: $352,834 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetUNICA: $325,705 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $180,955 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $171,574 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDHAVEN INC: $168,449 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetKIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $147,976 over 6y, 28% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $145,162 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetCHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $139,927 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILIES AND YOUTH INC: $69,320 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO: $61,467 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO: $34,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY: $31,168 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetOTERO COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $28,425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRICORE LABORATORY SERVICES CORP: $6,371 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO: $5,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM ↗
  • Who funds LA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds SILVER REGIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CASA FORTALEZA ↗
  • Who funds ARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds St Vincent Hospital ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL REFUGE FOR BATTERED ADULTS ↗
  • Who funds AFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO WELLNESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTA'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds UNICA ↗
  • Who funds TAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
  • Who funds CHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES AND YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY ↗
  • Who funds OTERO COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM29× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · National Children's Alliance Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · The James N Cost Foundation · New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs?

    Find your warmest path to New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph