Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc

To ensure fair and equal access to housing in safe, healthy, revitalized communities

$890M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$3.1MCommunity Improvement$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.1MFood & Nutrition$1.4MPhilanthropy$867kHealth$346kEducation$295kReligion$225kCrime & Legal$210kOther$6.1M
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 60 grants below total $5,106,538 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $890,111,727 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $885,005,189 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k50 grants · $4.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION$250,000
MULTI-COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC$100,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$100,000
HELP 2 OTHERS FOUNDATION$100,000
THE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY$100,000
MISSISSIPPI HOUSING PARTNERSHIP$100,000
FAITHWORKS INC$100,000
THE CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY BIRMINGHAM AREA COMMAND$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF THE SHOALS$100,000
STEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES$100,000
VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES$100,000
CHRISTIAN SERVICE MISSION$100,000
COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY JACKSON CORPS$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%King's Home: $10k → 7%ATHENS LIMESTONE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $100k → 11%HEARTS OF CLEBURNE: $20k → 16%LIFTED HIGHER MINISTRIES INC: $40k → 16%RAINBOW OMEGA INC: $22k → 18%CATHOLIC SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 19%MULTI-COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $100k → 24%THE HAVEN AT FIRST & MARKET INC: $100k → 8%Rescue Mission Ministries: $100k → 20%FAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC: $100k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICE MISSION: $100k → 16%Community Service Program of West Alabama: $100k → 17%VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES: $100k → 23%Rescue Mission Ministries: $50k → 20%JOURNEY HOME INC: $100k → 11%VOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES: $100k → 23%Connecticut Coaltion to End Homelessness Inc: $100k → 11%Voice of Calvary Ministries: $100k → 23%Christian Service Mission: $50k → 16%THE CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $100k → 11%Christian Service Mission: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $90k → 16%Urban Ministries: $50k → 16%RENEW BIRMINGHAM: $100k → 16%RENEW BIRMINGHAM: $50k → 16%Mercy Delivarence Ministries: $85k → 16%MERCY DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%MERCY DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 16%COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $97k → 16%Collat Jewish Family Services: $52k → 16%Children's Aid Society: $100k → 16%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%WOMEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION NETWORK: $20k → 16%Jefferson County Committee for Economic Opportunity: $85k → 16%Grace House: $90k → 16%THE MOTHERS' MILK BANK OF ALABAMA: $20k → 16%CHANGED LIVES CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $46k → 16%Correct posting Common Thread: $9k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $100k → 16%First Light Shelter: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 52 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
42

Total granted

$13M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+13%

Still filing today

87%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NAHMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +2% · 47% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $500k · revenue +10%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $432k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $260k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER RICHMOND & PETERSBURG
    one grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue -58%
  • UNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue +85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
2
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
3
Montgomery Area Coalition for the Homeless Inc

To evaluate needs, facilitate solutions, and seek resources to end homelessness in the river region.

Human Services
4
Family Promise of Coastal Alabama

Develop and provide services and facilities for homeless and low income families of the coastal alabama area, including, but not limited to providing food, clothing, shelter, social work services, and low cost housing

Human Services
5
Community Alliance for the Homeless

Community alliance for the homeless unites partners and coordinates a comprehensive response system to end homelessness in memphis and shelby county.

Human Services
6
Alabama Affordable Housing Association Inc

To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.

Community Improvement
7
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

—
8
Community Networks Inc

Providing services to the homeless, low income individuals, and hiv/aids infected and affected individuals

Housing & Shelter
9
United Community Ministries Inc

Providing food & shelter to the homeless and transitioning the homeless toward permanent independence in housing.

Human Services
10
Food Bank of North Alabama Inc

collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations

Food & Nutrition
11
Rebuilding Together Central Alabama

Bringing volunteers and communities together to improve the homes and lives of low-income homeowners.

Community Improvement
12
Family Promise of Cobb County

Our mission is to assist homeless families with children achieve adequate and consistent income, stable housing,and lasting independence by mobilizing local interfaith communities to provide temporary meals, shelter, compassionate…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg and the most unlike its peers is Kikstart Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Jewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Women & Girls Leadership De…School District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr17%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr12%32%35–55yr17%28%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/117
the rest of the field
14%
3,156/22,662

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
101/103
Grantees still filing
66/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP — $830,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPNATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION — $500,000 · OtherNATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSOCI…CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $350,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION — $324,142 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC — $300,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $260,000 · Other+42 more — $4,224,971 · Other+42 moreVOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES — $300,000 · Human ServicesVOICE OF CALVARY MIN…COLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BIRMINGHAM — $248,350 · Human ServicesCOLLAT JEWISH FAMILY…CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT COALITIO…FAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES CENT…THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC — $190,421 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRI…MERCY DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES — $185,000 · Human ServicesMERCY DELIVERANCE MI…Christian Service Mission Inc — $155,000 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesRENEW BIRMINGHAM — $150,000 · Human Services+23 more — $1,302,300 · Human Services+23 moreNAHMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,250,000 · Community ImprovementNAHMA EDUCATIONA…Community Care Development Network — $300,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Care D…THE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LINK OF CULL…HISPANIC AND IMMIGRANT CENTER OF ALABAMA — $200,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC AND IMM…BESSEMER REDEVELOPMENT CORP — $200,000 · Community ImprovementBESSEMER REDEVEL…Prairie Opportunity Inc — $200,000 · Community ImprovementPrairie Opportun…+1 more — $60,000 · Community ImprovementFORKIDS INC — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterFORKIDS INCMississippi Housing Partnership — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterMississippi H…CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOUSING ASSOCIAT OF BILOXI INC — $300,000 · Housing & ShelterCATHOLIC CHAR…IMMACARE INC — $275,000 · Housing & ShelterIMMACARE INCGRACE HOUSE INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterGRACE HOUSE I…EAST LAKE INITIATIVE — $157,250 · Housing & ShelterEAST LAKE INI…DOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION — $118,400 · Housing & ShelterDOWNTOWN JIMM…Faithworks Inc — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterPACIFIC HOUSE INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSING & SHELTER CORPORATION — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterONE ROOF — $90,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterFEED MORE INC — $400,000 · Food & NutritionFEED MORE…THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC — $300,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SOCIE…FEEDING ALABAMA — $240,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING A…KIKSTART INC — $160,000 · Food & NutritionKIKSTART …MAGIC CITY HARVEST INC — $148,000 · Food & NutritionMAGIC CIT…PRESTWICK COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $74,500 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $90,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 moreUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $431,849 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INC — $140,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $95,600 · PhilanthropyREFUGE 1212 INC — $140,000 · HealthAIDS ALABAMA INC — $100,000 · HealthLGBT LIFE CENTER — $86,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 · Health
Other$6,789,113Human Services$3,081,071Community Improvement$2,510,000Housing & Shelter$2,090,650Food & Nutrition$1,412,500Philanthropy$867,449Health$346,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAHMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,250,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetNATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION — $500,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $431,849 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $350,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Care Development Network — $300,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetVOICE OF CALVARY MINISTRIES — $300,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetFORKIDS INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC — $300,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetMississippi Housing Partnership — $300,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LINK OF CULLMAN COUNTY INC — $300,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HOUSING ASSOCIAT OF BILOXI INC — $300,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetIMMACARE INC — $275,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCOLLAT JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BIRMINGHAM — $248,350 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetFEEDING ALABAMA — $240,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDANIEL PAYNE COLLEGE VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetWALKER COUNTY COMMUNITY AGENCY INC — $225,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC — $210,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSTEWPOT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $200,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHISPANIC AND IMMIGRANT CENTER OF ALABAMA — $200,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES CENTER INC — $200,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetBESSEMER REDEVELOPMENT CORP — $200,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetPrairie Opportunity Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRACE HOUSE INC — $200,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC — $200,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC — $190,421 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMERCY DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES — $185,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetKIKSTART INC — $160,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetEAST LAKE INITIATIVE — $157,250 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetChristian Service Mission Inc — $155,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRENEW BIRMINGHAM — $150,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMAGIC CITY HARVEST INC — $148,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER RICHMOND & PETERSBURG — $140,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREFUGE 1212 INC — $140,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CONNECTICUT INC — $140,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION — $118,400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetONE PLACE METRO AL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER — $110,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF ALABAMA — $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMulti-County Community Service Agency Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $100,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Daniel Foundation…Alabama Power Foundat…Housing Affordability…Orlean & Ralph W Bees…Protective Life Found…Susan Mott Webb Chari…Hill Crest Foundation…Community Food Bank o…The Joseph S Bruno Ch…Community Partnership…Mike and Gillian Good…
The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL74.6× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Housing Affordability Trust · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Protective Life Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Community Food Bank of Central Alabama · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Community Partnership of Alabama Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • United Way of Connecticut Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Chrysalis Center Inc — 93% of income from government
  • Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation — 77% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness Inc — 54% of income from government
  • Immacare Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
  • United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Ywca Hartford Region Inc — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc?

Find your warmest path to Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines